SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Sudhir Power Projects Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Unipower Projects Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

1. Petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

2. It is contended that the parties had entered into an agreement and a work order was placed on the respondent dated 11.06.2021 which contains an arbitration clause.

3. The Arbitration Clause 19 reads as under: -

    "19. Dispute Resolution/Arbitration & jurisdiction: Any dispute or difference whatsoever arising between the parties out of or relating to the construction, meaning, scope operation or effect of this contract or the validity or the breach thereof shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the award made in pursuance thereof shall be binding on the parties. The dispute shall be referred to the arbitration of Sole Arbitrator to be appointed by CMD/MD of SPPL, whereas Seat and venue of the arbitration shall be New Delhi/Gurugram and the proceedings shall be undertaken in English."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the registered office of both petitioner as well as respondent is in Delhi and accordingly petitioner has exercised the option to approach the Cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top