Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
LKT Engineering Consultants Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Planning and Infrastructural Developments Consultants Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. various mous establish grounds for arbitration. (Para 1) |
| 2. parties request common arbitrator for disputes. (Para 2) |
| 3. arbitration to be administered by diac. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. petitions disposed with arbitration order. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. These petitions arise out of different MOUs entered into between the same parties. The respective clauses of reference of disputes to arbitration is similar.
2. Learned counsel for parties submit that though the disputes arise out of different agreements and the claims and counter-claims are different, as the parties are common, it is prayed that one arbitral tribunal be constituted to arbitrate the separate disputes emanating between the parties.
3. Accordingly, the petitions are allowed and the disputes are referred to the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), which would appoint one common arbitrator to arbitrate all the disputes of the parties. The arbitration shall take place under the aegis of the DIAC in accordance with its rules and regulations.
4. The arbitrator would be entitled to charge fees in accordance with the schedule of fee stipulated by the DIAC.
5. The arbitrator shall also
Common arbitral tribunal can be formed for disputes arising from multiple agreements between the same parties, fostering efficiency under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court affirmed that disputes arising from a common contract can be referred to an Arbitral Tribunal if both parties consent to the arbitration venue.
The court ruled that arbitration clauses providing unilateral authority for appointing arbitrators are unenforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, requiring proper appointment procedure....
Parties consented to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, allowing referral to an arbitrator for dispute resolution, emphasizing procedural efficiency.
The court affirmed that overlapping disputes can justify the establishment of a common Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Arbitration disputes can be referred to the designated arbitration body with mutual consent from both parties, ensuring compliance with procedural requirements as stipulated by relevant statutes.
Parties in a partnership may resolve disputes through arbitration as per their agreement and consent, including provision for fees and necessary disclosures.
The court confirmed that disputes can be referred to arbitration with mutual consent under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ensuring adherence to procedural rules.
The court referred the lease agreement disputes to arbitration at the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, following the respondent's non-objection to this referral.
The court established that parties can mutually agree to appoint a sole arbitrator for identical disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and emphasized the requirement for disclosure by ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
