SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
American Express India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. direction for processing rectification applications (Para 1)
2. failure to process applications (Para 2)
3. notice accepted by respondents (Para 3 , 4)
4. writ petition disposed with directions (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--By way of the present petition, petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to pass orders disposing of the rectification applications for the Assessment Years 2005-06, 2006-07, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2012-13, 2014-15, 2017-18, 2006-07 (FBT) and 2007-08 (FBT) filed by the Petitioner and consequentially, grant refund of Rs.45.60 crore arising there from along with applicable interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'Act').

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents have failed to process rectification applications filed by the petitioner without any reason or cause.

3. Issue notice.

4. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

5. Keeping in view the limited prayer sought in the present writ petition, respondent No.1 is directed to decide the rectification applications for Assessment Years 2005-06, 2006-07, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2012-13, 2014-15, 201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top