Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
National Labour Co-operative Federation of India Limited – Appellant
Versus
N. Satyanarayana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of board meeting decisions (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. arbitrability of disputes involving employees (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. legal authority in convening meetings (Para 7 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. interpretation of statutory provisions (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. limits of judicial intervention in arbitral awards (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. conclusion on the dismissal of petition (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
O.M.P. 2/2022 and I.A.3988/2022 (stay), I.A.3989/2022 (Section 151 CPC for exemption), I.A.3990/2022 (Section 151 CPC for exemption) and I.A.4023/2022 (Section 151 CPC for exemption)
1. The 141st meeting of the Board of Directors of the National Labour Cooperative Federation of India Limited (NLCF, hereinafter), convened pursuant to an agenda notice dated 20th November, 2021, was called into question by the respondent in arbitral proceedings, as the respondent's services were discontinued pursuant to a decision taken at the said meeting. The impugned award holds the 141st board meeting dated 3rd December, 2021 not to have been convened in accordance with law and, consequently, declares the business transacted at the said meeting, including the decision to discontinue the services of the re
Arbitration of disputes involving disciplinary action requires adherence to statutory procedures; improper convening of a board meeting renders decisions null and void.
The interpretation of the relevant legal provisions by the learned Arbitrator was wholly perverse and had to be set aside. The requirement of obtaining authorization from the Board of the cooperative....
Respondents have pressed the challenge to the maintainability of the present petition on the ground that it falls outside the scope of Section 9 of the A&C Act, this Court does not consider it apposi....
The Registrar of cooperative societies does not possess the authority to issue interim orders when appointing an arbitrator under the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act.
The court held that excessive costs imposed on claimants in statutory arbitration violate public policy, allowing severability of the cost portion of the award while upholding the dismissal of electi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, including the disclosure requirements, apply to arbitration proceedings under sp....
The existence of an arbitration agreement under Section 11(6) allows for disputes related to a memorandum of family settlement to be arbitrable, reinforcing the principle of kompetenz-kompetenz.
Disputes related to the election of officers in a multi-State co-operative society should be referred to arbitration under section 84 of the Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002.
The provisions of the MSMED Act prevail over the Arbitration Act in cases involving micro, small, and medium enterprises, and active concealment of material facts can disentitle a party from discreti....
The judgment established the overriding effect of the MSMED Act over the Arbitration Act, emphasizing the entitlement of the respondent to approach the HMSEFC for redressal of its grievance, and the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
