SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Manju Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Vilas Gupta – Respondent


Table of Content
1. disputes to be referred to arbitration (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. previous orders and their implications (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. existence of arbitrable disputes acknowledged (Para 7 , 8)
4. arbitration clause became unenforceable (Para 9 , 10)
5. legal standards for arbitration agreement (Para 11 , 12)
6. opposition to the petition based on previous orders (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
7. reviewing arbitrability of disputes (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
8. principles of separability and competency (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
9. court's discretion in arbitration (Para 23 , 24)
10. appointment of arbitrator due to vacancy (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
11. appointment order issued for arbitration (Para 32 , 33 , 34)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

(Video-Conferencing)

1. By this petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act"), the petitioners seek reference of disputes that had arisen vis-a-vis the respondents, to arbitration, in accordance with Clause 3.15 of a Memorandum of Family Settlement (hereinafter referred to as "MFS"), dated 28th April, 2007, executed among the petitioners and the respondents, being the members of one family.

2. A reading of the MSF reveals

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top