N. SATHISH KUMAR
K. Sankara Narayanan (Died) – Appellant
Versus
Central Registrar of Multi State Cooperative Credit Societies – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Original Petition No. 385 of 2018 was filed by one K.Sankara Narayanan, one of the Members of the Railway Employees' Cooperative Credit Society Limited (2nd respondent) against the common order dated 26.01.2018 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator, a Retired Judge of this Court in A.R.C.No. 1 of 2016 dismissing the claim of the petitioner challenging the election to the Board of Directors while Original Petition in O.P.No. 384 of 2018 was filed by him against the order dated 26.01.2018 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator, a Retired Judge of this Court in A.R.C.No. 8 of 2016 dismissing the claim of the petitioner challenging the appointment of the 3rd respondent – N.Kanniah as Chairman of the 2nd respondent Society.
2. Similarly, Original Petition No. 387 of 2018 was filed by one G.Sivakumar, another member of the Railway Employees' Cooperative Credit Society Limited (2nd respondent) against the common order dated 26.01.2018 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator, a Retired Judge of this Court in A.R.C.No. 2 of 2016, dismissing the claim of the petitioner challenging the election to the Board of Directors while Original Petition in O.P.No. 386 of 2018 was filed by him aga
Aero Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Ravinder Kumar Suri
Associate Builders v. Delhi Develoment Authority
Chintamanrao v. State of M.P. AIR 1951 SC 118
J.G. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
Messrs. Basant Lal Banarsi Lal v. Bansi Lal Dagdulal
NHAI v. Gayatri Jhansi Roadways Ltd. (2020) 17 SCC 626
ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003) 5 SCC 705
Sanjeev Kumar Jain v. Raghubir Charitable Trust
Union of India v. Singh Builders Syndicate
V. Subramaniam v. Rajesh Raghavendra Rao
Vipulabhai Chaudhary v. Gujarat Milk Cooperative Federation Limited
The court held that excessive costs imposed on claimants in statutory arbitration violate public policy, allowing severability of the cost portion of the award while upholding the dismissal of electi....
The principle of party autonomy is crucial in arbitration proceedings, and the Arbitral Tribunal cannot impose its will and wishes without reason or cause.
The Court held that the impugned award with respect to Claim 7 was not well-reasoned as required by the Act under Section 31(3), and the impugned award with respect to the award in Claim 11 is contra....
The court affirmed that the claimant must secure the necessary Airport Entry Permits and upheld the arbitration award, ruling no breach by the respondent; consent regarding the arbitrator's appointme....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.