SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Sanjay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks pension benefits. (Para 1 , 2)
2. entitlement for pro-rata pension. (Para 3)
3. respondents to consider petitioner's case. (Para 5)
4. court's directive on pension consideration. (Para 6 , 7)
5. disposal of petition with directions. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashing the letter dated 31.08.2022 issued by the respondents rejecting the request of the petitioner for grant of pro rata pension; a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension in favour of the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits i.e. 28.05.1998 in terms of judgment dated 24.11.2020 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P. (C) No.98/2020 as well as other judgments passed by this Court as well as the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

2. According to petitioner, he was enrolled in the Indian Air Force on 18.01.1988 and underwent required training successfully. Petitioner had appeared in the interview and was selected to the post of Probationary Officer in Associate Bank of SBI (State Bank of Patiala) after obtaining "No Objection Certificate" dated 03.11.1997 from respondents. The petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top