Rajender Kumar Sethi vs V.G. Marketing Pvt. Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Rajender Kumar Sethi – Appellant
Versus
V.G. Marketing Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent

Table of Content
1. request for expeditious trial court proceedings. (Para 1)
2. background of trial court listings and delays. (Para 2)
3. court's disapproval of misuse of judicial process. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
4. dismissal of petition with costs. (Para 6)

ORDER(Oral)

1. Ms. Simran Sadyara, learned Counsel for the petitioners, seeks a direction to the learned trial court to decide CS 1612/2020 expeditiously.

2. It is seen from the order sheets before the learned Civil Judge that the learned Civil Judge has taken up this matter on 19th November, 2020, 9th December, 2020, 14th January, 2021, 30th March, 2021, 7th September, 2021, 29th September, 2021, 18th November, 2021 and 31st January, 2022 and that the matter is now listed on 25th April, 2022.

3. This Court is completely befuddled as to how the petitioners can even envisage any direction to the learned trial court to deal with this matter with greater expedition than has been displaced by the learned trial court in this case.

4. Post resumption of normal court work after pandemic, trial courts are overburdened and this Court is hesitant to subject them to any greater burden than is already on them.

5. This petition, in my view,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document