SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Tarun Nandwani - Appellant
Versus
Ram Swarup Nandwani - Respondent
RFA 859 of 2010 & CM Appl. 17781 of 2022
Decided On : 11-04-2022




A family settlement can resolve disputes amicably and be deemed enforceable when reduced to writing and agreed upon by all parties involved.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XXIII Rule 3 - Family settlement - Dispute between parties resolved through an oral Family Settlement dated 14th January, 2022 reduced to writing - Suit decreed in terms of settlement, rendering appeal disposed of. (Paras 6, 8, 9)

(B) Settlement terms - Exclusive ownership of properties assigned, with provisions for joint ownership and agreements on rental income - Agreement binding on parties and their heirs. (Paras 6, 8)

Table of Content
1. parties reached an amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court acknowledges settlement and dismisses appeal. (Para 7 , 8)
3. suit decreed as per settlement terms. (Para 9)
4. decree sheet to be drawn accordingly. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

C. Hari Shankar, J.

CM APPL. 17781/2022 in RFA 859/2010

1. This application, under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeks decreeing of Suit 12/2008, earlier decreed in part in favour of the respondents by the impugned judgment dated 21st September, 2010 of the learned Additional District Judge ("the learned ADJ"), forming subject matter of challenge in the appeal.

2. The learned Counsel submit that the dispute between the parties stands amicably resolved vide an oral Family Settlement dated 14th January, 2022, which stands reduced in writing vide Memorandum dated 14th February, 2022.

3. A copy of the said memorandum of the oral Family Settlement dated 14th January, 2022 is placed on record along with this application.

4. Learned Counsel for the parties also submit that Respondent 1 has also challenged the impugned judgment dated 21st September, 2010 by way of RFA 13/2011, which has been admitted and is pending before a coordinate Bench of this Court. However, it is submitted that Respondent 1, as the appellant in that appeal, has expired.

5. Mr. Arun Batta who represents the legal heirs of the deceased Respondent 1 in the said proceedings submits that that appeal has thus abated and they do not seek to move for revival of the appeal, as the disputes between the parties stand amicably resolved.

6. The terms of the settlement, as contained in the aforenoted memorandum of oral Family Settlement dated 14th January, 2022, are the following:

    "1. The First Party will be exclusive and absolute owner of Property No.27, Sector-12A, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075 and Second Party will not claim any right, title or interest therein;

    2. The Second Party will be the exclusive and absolute owner of following properties and First Party will not claim any right, title or interest therein:

    a. Property bearing No. A-2/175, First Floor, Janakpuri, New Delhi

    b. Plot No. I-406, TOI, Kundli, KR2-1418, Delhi

    3. That both the Parties (First Party and Second Party) will jointly and in equal share own six shops being Nos.301, 301B, 302, 303, 304 and 307 situated at C-l, LSC, Janakpuri, New Delhi and they shall jointly let out and or sell out the same as per mutual discussions and agreements. The rent received on letting out and/or sale proceeds received on sale of the said six shops shall be shared equally between the parties.

    4. The Parties sha1l move joint/compromise application before the Hon'ble High Court in Regular First Appeal No.859/2010 for passing of compromise decree in term of/to give effect to the present settlement.

    5. That the Second Party will give no objection (in whatever form required) for the lease of rent qua Property No.27, Sector-12A, Dwarka, New Delhi lying deposited with the bank in the form of FDR in terms of order mentioned hereinabove to and/in favour of First Party, which has deposited in term of order dated 23.03.2010 passed by the Court of Sh. Arun Bhardwaj, ADJ, Dwarka in Suit No. 12/2009 (now numbered as Misc. DJ ADJ No. 15209/16 and presided over by Sh. Sachin Jain ADJ-02, South West, Dwarka Courts Delhi). The First Party shall be entitled to withdraw all the said amounts and the Second Party shall not claim any right therein.

    6. The parties to the present agreement will not claim any rent, damages, use and occupation charges, if any, received by either of them or by their parents or grand-mother, from any of the properties prior to the execution of the present Family Settlement.

    7. The Parties undertake to execute all the necessary documents including making Applications to the Hon'ble Court to give proper effect to this settlement.

    8. The parties undertake to sign, execute and register all necessary documents, if required,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top