SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
Union of India - Appellant
Versus
Om Vajrakaya Construction Company - Respondent
O.M.P. (COMM) 299 of 2021 & I.A. 12966 of 2021
Decided On : 20-12-2021




The Arbitral Tribunal's awards of costs and findings on execution delays were upheld, but the award of pendente lite interest was set aside for being contrary to the governing contractual provisions.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 - Arbitral award challenged on grounds of incorrect pendente lite interest, delay ascribed to the respondent, and costs awarded. The court found the award of interest contrary to GCC Clause 64.5, confirming that the Arbitral Tribunal’s findings on execution delays were binding and well-founded, with no grounds for interference. (Paras 22, 24, 26, 38)

(B) Costs - Applicability of Section 31A of A&C Act noted; discretion to award costs exists independent of contract provisions unless agreed post-dispute. (Paras 31-38)

Facts of the case:
Disputes arose from a construction contract, with delays attributed to non-availability of resources and necessary approvals leading to arbitration invoked by the contractor due to delayed payments and unapproved claims.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld certain arbitral findings while ruling the award of pendente lite interest as impermissible, hence, set aside on that ground.

Issues: Whether the Arbitral Tribunal rightly awarded pendente lite interest and determined execution delays.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the contract's terms on interest must be honored and that findings regarding execution delays, arising from evidence, are binding unless attempted otherwise by re-examination.

Result: Petition partly allowed, awarding on costs upheld, but pendente lite interest set aside.

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J.

1. The petitioner (hereinafter the `Railway') has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the `A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 08.04.2020 (hereinafter the `impugned award') passed by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by Justice (Retd.) Anil Kumar as the Sole Arbitrator (hereinafter the `Arbitral Tribunal').

2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to a contract signed between the parties on 16.12.2011 (hereafter the `Contract').

Factual Matrix

3. On 13.01.2011, tenders were invited by the Railway for work described as `Earth work in filling for embankment with contractor's own earth and cutting to the required profile, Blanketing materials including compaction by vibratory roller, construction/extension of minor bridges less than 6.00 m, retaining wall and other allied works from Ch 0.00 km to Ch 22.71 kms between Ambala Cantt-Dhappar railway Stations in connection with Ambala-Dhappar doubling on UMB-KLK Section, with the overall supervisory control of the Dy. Chief Engineer/C Ambala, Northern Railway.' (hereafter the `Project').

4. Pursuant to the said tender, the respondent firm (hereafter `OVC') submitted its bid. The same was accepted and by a Letter of Acceptance dated 07.04.2011 (hereafter the `LoA'), the work was awarded to OVC. The period of completion of the works was stipulated to be eighteen months and was required to be completed by 06.10.2012. The Contract with respect to the said work was finally signed on 16.12.2011.

5. OVC claims that after the award of the works, the Railway advised it to deploy its machinery, staff, labour and construct the site office(s) as per the tender stipulations for expeditious execution of the works within the stipulated time. However, the arrangements made by OVC at the site remained unutilized due to non-availability of drawings, site for execution, cutting of trees, non-sanctioning of Engineering Scale Plan (ESP) etc.

6. Despite, OVC's repeated efforts to execute the works, no progress was made as the trees causing hinderances were not removed and full site was not made available to OVC. Thereafter, OVC sent several letters to the Railway requesting it to supply a complete set of drawings, remove the ESP of Dhappar, Lallru and Dhoulkot stations and, to remove the trees at the railway track at Lallru station; however, the said letters did not elicit any satisfactory response.

7. Due to addition in the scope of work and the various hindrances in executing the works, the Railway extended the date of completion of the works to 30.10.2014, without levy of any penalties.

8. Thereafter, on 08.08.2013, one of the constituent partners of OVC expired in a road accident and OVC requested the Railway to treat the work as closed. OVC requested the Railway to prepare the Final Bill along with the extra items executed at the site on the instructions of the supervisory staff. OVC claimed that it was assured that the extra items would be paid along with the Final Bill at an early date along with the earnest money, Performance Guarantee and security deposit.

9. The work was finally treated as `satisfactorily completed' on 15.10.2014 and thereafter, a Completion Certificate was issued and the Performance Guarantee furnished by OVC was released.

10. OVC states that the Railway had assured it that it would settle all disputes at the time of finalization of the Final Bill. However, the Railway failed to include some of OVC's claims in the Final Bill. OVC claims that it was directed to accept the Final Bill prepared by the Railway without any protest and, to tender its `No Claim Certificate' failing which the admitted amounts due would not be released.

11. OVC had requested the Railway to prepare the Final Bill on 18.11.2014. However, the Final Bill was prepared after a period of fourteen months from the date of co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top