SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Rohit Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Dgms (Army) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. seeking a writ for representation decision. (Para 1)
2. lack of grounds for public interest litigation. (Para 3 , 6)
3. petition based on invalid claims against a proper party. (Para 4)
4. legal precedents on service termination petitions. (Para 5)
5. dismissal of writ petition with costs. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)

C.M.No.10352/2022 (exemptions)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 3516/2022

1. This so-called Public Interest Litigation has been preferred seeking following reliefs:

    "i. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/s, order/s, direction/s directing the Respondent to decide the Representation dated 17.11.2021 of the Petitioner forthwith within a stipulated time period, with a written intimation to the present Petitioner. And/Or;

    ii. Pass any other or further order/s or direction/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper be also awarded to the Petitioner and against the Respondents, in the interest of justice."

2. We have heard petitioner appearing in person.

3. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that this is not a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top