IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J.
Sumit Goel - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Bail Appln. 1321 of 2021
Decided On : 20-04-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case and allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against the bail application. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's decision on bail application. (Para 5) |
ORDER
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 0712/2020 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh, Delhi.
2. In brief, the case of the prosecution is that marriage between the parties was solemnized on 01.07.2009. Further, the complainant Smt. Komal Agarwal was subjected to mental, physical, sexual, emotional, economical torture by the petitioner-husband and repeated dowry demands were also made by the petitioner and his family members. It has also been alleged that the petitioner used to beat the complainant and had kept her starving for a period of 07 days. The complainant was kicked out of the matrimonial home on 23.02.2019. A settlement is alleged to have been arrived between the petitioner and the complainant vide Panchayatnama dated 28.09.2019 but the petitioner did not adhere to the terms of the settlement. A complaint was registered before the CAW Cell, North District, Delhi which culminated into registration of present FIR No.0712/2020 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Shalimar Bagh, Delhi.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that complaint has been filed on account of matrimonial differences. He further submits that the charge sheet has been filed before the learned trial court and the other co-accused namely Smt. Anju Goel, Smt. Rinki Sharma and Sh. Vivek Sharma have been granted bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. by the court of Ms. Kiran Gupta, Learned ASJ, North-West district, Rohini Courts vide orders dated 19.01.2021 and 08.04.2021.
4. However, the bail application is opposed by the Learned APP for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant. It is submitted that the petitioner has failed to honour the settlement arrived between the parties vide Panchayatnama dated 28.09.2019 and the bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by the learned trial court considering the nature of allegations against the petitioner.
5. The petitioner was granted interim protection by this court vide order dated 19.04.2021. The petitioner has already joined the investigation and Charge-sheet has already been filed. The other co-accused have already been released on anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to bail subject to furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/SHO of the concerned Police Station/learned trial court.
The application is accordingly disposed of.
A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information and compliance.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when the accused cooperates with the investigation and where similar co-accused have been released on bail, despite serious allegations of domestic violence.
The court considered the nature of the allegations, the petitioner's adherence to a previous settlement, and the fact that the other co-accused had already been released on anticipatory bail in grant....
Grant of anticipatory bail - matter is being settled between the husband, wife and her in-laws, as such, the present applicants be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.
The court recognizes circumstances for anticipatory bail in matrimonial disputes involving allegations of dowry and assault.
Anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. when petitioners have no criminal antecedents and face only general allegations without medical evidence.
The court determines that allegations of dowry demand do not justify custodial interrogation at the stage of anticipatory bail consideration.
Anticipatory bail can be granted to prevent detrimental effects on marital relationships, even in cases of serious allegations like matrimonial cruelty.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of discretion in granting anticipatory bail based on the specific allegations and individual circumstances of the petitioners.
Anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 when allegations do not warrant preemptive detention, provided conditions to protect ongoing investigations are set.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.