SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Anu Malhotra, J.
Ranjeet Singh Khatri - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 13742 of 2019 and W.P.(C) No. 2536 of 2020 & CM Appl. 45193 of 2021
Decided On : 26-04-2022




Compensation must be paid for un-acquired land vested in the Government under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, and restoration of possession cannot be granted.

Headnote:(A) Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 11, 17(1), and 23(1A) - Petitions regarding restoration of land and compensation for un-acquired land - The court held that since the possession of the land had vested in the Government, restoration of possession cannot be ordered and compensation for the un-acquired portion must be assessed. (Paras 30-33)

(B) Article 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India - The petitioners claimed violation of their constitutional rights due to the denial of alternative plots unlike their co-sharers - The court directed reconsideration of their application for alternative plots and the need to compensate for the un-acquired land. (Paras 30 & 31)

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek relief regarding land possession. (Para 1 , 2)
2. historical context of land acquisition detailed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. compensation details for acquired land shared. (Para 7 , 8)
4. petitioners argue for full compensation for acquired land. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. court assesses legal issues surrounding land acquisition. (Para 12 , 15 , 18)
6. claims of discrimination and violation of rights clarified. (Para 16)
7. demarcation and possession details are established. (Para 17 , 19)
8. legal precedents applied to dismiss claims. (Para 24 , 25 , 28)
9. court's decision on compensation and reassessment of claims. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
10. final order regarding petition dismissal and future considerations. (Para 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner of W.P.(C) No. 13742/2019, Mr.Ranjeet Singh Khatri S/o late Sh.Tek Chand makes the following prayers:

    "i) Issue a writ of certiorari for calling the revenue record from the office of respondents in respect of land of Khasra No. 23//6/2 total measuring 4 bigha 14 biswa, situated in the revenue estate of village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi;

    ii) A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order thereby directing the respondents to restore the possession of the un-acquired land of the petitioner comprising in Khasra no. 23//6/2 (0-10) out of and measuring 4 bigha 14 biswa, situated in the revenue estate of village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi, which has been illegally taken by the respondents alongwith the other acquired land of the petitioner;

    iii) A writ, order thereby directing the respondents to provide the passage to the petitioner to the land of Khasra no. 23//6/2 (0-10) situated in the revenue estate of village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi, from the acquired land of the respondents for his ingress and egress to his aforesaid un-acquired land;

    iv) A writ, order thereby directing the respondents to pay the damages to the petitioner for illegal use and possession of the above land of Khasra No. 23//6/2 measuring 10 biswa by the respondents @ Rs.1,00,000/- per year from the date of illegally taking the possession of the above land of the petitioner, i.e. 24.01.1996 until possession of above land is handed over to the petitioner;

    v) Award costs of the present petition in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents; and

    vi) Issue any other or further appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper ill the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents."

2. The petitioner of W.P.(C) No. 2536/2020, Mr.Satpal Singh, S/o late Sh.Buddhu @ Budh Ram has made identical prayers as made by Mr.R.S.Khatri, the petitioner of W.P.(C) No. 13742/2019 and thus, the respondents arrayed to both the petitions are identical as depicted hereinabove in the cause titles.

3. Sh. Tek Chand, F/o Sh.Ranjeet Singh Khatri and Sh.Buddhu @ Budh Ram, F/o Mr.Satpal Singh were brothers and Bhumidars of the land comprising in Khasra No.13//22/1(3-18), 14//25/1(3-00), 23//3(4-16), 4(4-16), 5(4-16), 6/2(4-14), 7(4-16), 8(4-16), 13(4-16), 14(4-11), 15(4-16), 16(2-12), 17(1-12), 18(0-18), 26(0-05), 24//l(4-16), 2(2-18), 9(0-14), 10(4-14), 11(3-12), 20(1-18), 15//1(3-12), 10(4-09), 26(0-06), 16//5/1(3-08), 5/2(0-16) and 6(4-16) total measuring 91 bigha 01 biswas, situated in the revenue estate of Village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi, to the extent of 1/2 share each and the khatauni of the year 1986-87 relating to Khata Khatauni No.6/4 placed on the record of both the petitions as Annexure-P1 is identical and the translated version thereof is reproduced as under:

4. On 05.04.1995, the appropriate Government issued a notification under under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to compulsorily acquire the land 733 bigha 10 biswas, situated in Village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi and the declaration under Section 6 of the said enactment was issued on 22.12.1995, copy of which is annexed as Annexure-P2 to both the petitions and




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top