IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Anu Malhotra, J.
Ranjeet Singh Khatri - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 13742 of 2019 and W.P.(C) No. 2536 of 2020 & CM Appl. 45193 of 2021
Decided On : 26-04-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek relief regarding land possession. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. historical context of land acquisition detailed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. compensation details for acquired land shared. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. petitioners argue for full compensation for acquired land. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court assesses legal issues surrounding land acquisition. (Para 12 , 15 , 18) |
| 6. claims of discrimination and violation of rights clarified. (Para 16) |
| 7. demarcation and possession details are established. (Para 17 , 19) |
| 8. legal precedents applied to dismiss claims. (Para 24 , 25 , 28) |
| 9. court's decision on compensation and reassessment of claims. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 10. final order regarding petition dismissal and future considerations. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner of W.P.(C) No. 13742/2019, Mr.Ranjeet Singh Khatri S/o late Sh.Tek Chand makes the following prayers:
"i) Issue a writ of certiorari for calling the revenue record from the office of respondents in respect of land of Khasra No. 23//6/2 total measuring 4 bigha 14 biswa, situated in the revenue estate of village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi;
ii) A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order thereby directing the respondents to restore the possession of the un-acquired land of the petitioner comprising in Khasra no. 23//6/2 (0-10) out of and measuring 4 bigha 14 biswa, situated in the revenue estate of village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi, which has been illegally taken by the respondents alongwith the other acquired land of the petitioner;
iii) A writ, order thereby directing the respondents to provide the passage to the petitioner to the land of Khasra no. 23//6/2 (0-10) situated in the revenue estate of village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi, from the acquired land of the respondents for his ingress and egress to his aforesaid un-acquired land;
iv) A writ, order thereby directing the respondents to pay the damages to the petitioner for illegal use and possession of the above land of Khasra No. 23//6/2 measuring 10 biswa by the respondents @ Rs.1,00,000/- per year from the date of illegally taking the possession of the above land of the petitioner, i.e. 24.01.1996 until possession of above land is handed over to the petitioner;
v) Award costs of the present petition in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents; and
vi) Issue any other or further appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper ill the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents."
2. The petitioner of W.P.(C) No. 2536/2020, Mr.Satpal Singh, S/o late Sh.Buddhu @ Budh Ram has made identical prayers as made by Mr.R.S.Khatri, the petitioner of W.P.(C) No. 13742/2019 and thus, the respondents arrayed to both the petitions are identical as depicted hereinabove in the cause titles.
3. Sh. Tek Chand, F/o Sh.Ranjeet Singh Khatri and Sh.Buddhu @ Budh Ram, F/o Mr.Satpal Singh were brothers and Bhumidars of the land comprising in Khasra No.13//22/1(3-18), 14//25/1(3-00), 23//3(4-16), 4(4-16), 5(4-16), 6/2(4-14), 7(4-16), 8(4-16), 13(4-16), 14(4-11), 15(4-16), 16(2-12), 17(1-12), 18(0-18), 26(0-05), 24//l(4-16), 2(2-18), 9(0-14), 10(4-14), 11(3-12), 20(1-18), 15//1(3-12), 10(4-09), 26(0-06), 16//5/1(3-08), 5/2(0-16) and 6(4-16) total measuring 91 bigha 01 biswas, situated in the revenue estate of Village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi, to the extent of 1/2 share each and the khatauni of the year 1986-87 relating to Khata Khatauni No.6/4 placed on the record of both the petitions as Annexure-P1 is identical and the translated version thereof is reproduced as under:


4. On 05.04.1995, the appropriate Government issued a notification under under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to compulsorily acquire the land 733 bigha 10 biswas, situated in Village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi and the declaration under Section 6 of the said enactment was issued on 22.12.1995, copy of which is annexed as Annexure-P2 to both the petitions and






Compensation must be paid for un-acquired land vested in the Government under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, and restoration of possession cannot be granted.
The court ruled that disputes regarding land possession and ownership require establishment of facts through appropriate statutory remedies, not simply through writ petitions.
Possession taken under land acquisition negates the lapse of proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, reaffirming that acquisition processes must adhere to statutory guidelines of compensatio....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and R....
The court upheld the DDA's right to possess land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, affirming the finality of the Supreme Court's judgment.
Ownership claims must be supported by existing legal documentation while adherence to limitation statutes may limit recovery rights in possession suits.
Mere possession or sporadic revenue entries do not confer ownership title; clear documentation and continuous proof of possession is necessary, especially against government parties.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for the acquisition proceedings to lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, the landowner must prove that possession was not taken and compe....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.