Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Ranjeet Singh Khatri – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek relief regarding land possession. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. historical context of land acquisition detailed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. compensation details for acquired land shared. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. petitioners argue for full compensation for acquired land. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court assesses legal issues surrounding land acquisition. (Para 12 , 15 , 18) |
| 6. claims of discrimination and violation of rights clarified. (Para 16) |
| 7. demarcation and possession details are established. (Para 17 , 19) |
| 8. legal precedents applied to dismiss claims. (Para 24 , 25 , 28) |
| 9. court's decision on compensation and reassessment of claims. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 10. final order regarding petition dismissal and future considerations. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner of W.P.(C) No. 13742/2019, Mr.Ranjeet Singh Khatri S/o late Sh.Tek Chand makes the following prayers:
"i) Issue a writ of certiorari for calling the revenue record from the office of respondents in respect of land of Khasra No. 23//6/2 total measuring 4 bigha 14 biswa, situated in the revenue estate of village Shahpur Garhi, Delhi;
ii) A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order thereby direc
Compensation must be paid for un-acquired land vested in the Government under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, and restoration of possession cannot be granted.
The court ruled that disputes regarding land possession and ownership require establishment of facts through appropriate statutory remedies, not simply through writ petitions.
Possession taken under land acquisition negates the lapse of proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, reaffirming that acquisition processes must adhere to statutory guidelines of compensatio....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and R....
The court upheld the DDA's right to possess land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, affirming the finality of the Supreme Court's judgment.
Ownership claims must be supported by existing legal documentation while adherence to limitation statutes may limit recovery rights in possession suits.
Mere possession or sporadic revenue entries do not confer ownership title; clear documentation and continuous proof of possession is necessary, especially against government parties.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for the acquisition proceedings to lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, the landowner must prove that possession was not taken and compe....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
