Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
MM9 International – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. violation of statutory time limits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. impugned order violated natural justice. (Para 8) |
| 3. order to reopen portal and decide matter. (Para 9) |
| 4. writ petition disposed with directions. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short `Act') and the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act dated 2nd April, 2022.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that Respondent No.2, without granting the minimum statutory time of seven days prescribed under Section 148A(b), had passed the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act and issued notice under Section 148 of the Act both dated 2nd April, 2022.
3. He states that Respondent No.2 issued a show cause notice under Section 148A(b) (digitally signed on 23rd March, 2022 at 11:46 PM), which was received by the Petitioner vide e-mail on 23rd March, 2022 at 11:52 PM.
4. He states that vide the said show cause notice, Respondent No.2 had directed the Petitioner to file its reply by 29th March, 2022. He states that the Petitioner attempted to file its reply on 30th March, 2022, ho
Notice issued without granting statutory time to respond violated the principles of natural justice, rendering the order invalid.
Statutory rights require a minimum seven-day response period under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, which was violated in this case.
Minimum time of seven days to be granted to the Assessee to file its reply to the show cause notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The court affirmed that taxpayers are entitled to adequate time to respond to notices under the Income Tax Act, and failure to consider timely responses constitutes a violation of statutory duties.
The Income Tax Officer failed to comply with mandatory response time requirements, violating the petitioner's right to due process under the Income Tax Act.
Petitioners are entitled to adequate time to respond to tax notices, and minimal delays in requests for adjournments, especially for residents abroad, should not result in dismissal of rights.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the right of the assessee to adequate time to respond to the Show Cause Notice and the exclusion of the period given to the assessee in computing t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the notice under Section 148A(b) must provide the assessee with not less than seven days to submit a reply, and the issuance of notices must c....
A time extension request must be honored to ensure fair administrative procedure under income tax regulations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
