Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
Shubham Thakral - Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9293 of 2022
Decided On : 03-06-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to notice under income tax act. (Para 1) |
| 2. right to adequate response time for notices. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. agreement to remand for fresh assessment. (Para 4) |
| 4. order for fresh reasoned decision. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral):
C.M.No.27835/2022
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.9293/2022 & C.M.No.27834/2022
1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short `the Act') dated 23rd March, 2022 and the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act dated 30th March, 2022 for the Assessment Year 2018-19.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that only three days' time was granted to the Petitioner to respond as against the mandatory statutory period of at least seven days. He further states that though the annexure annexed with the notice granted the Petitioner eight days' time to respond, yet the e-filing submission portal was closed on 26th March, 2022 itself in violation of the statutory mandate of Section 148A (b) of the Act.
3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner relies on the decision of this Court in Shri Sai Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd Versus ITO, Ward 43-6 [W.P.(C) No.7385/2022], wherein it has been held that under Section 148A(b) of the Act, a minimum time of seven days has to be granted to the Assessee to file its reply to the show cause notice.
4. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the Respondent on instructions states that the Respondent-Revenue has no objection if the present matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision in accordance with law.
5. Consequently, the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act dated 30th March, 2022 for the Assessment Year 2018-19 is set aside and the Assessing Officer is directed to pass a fresh reasoned order in accordance with law after considering the reply of the Petitioner, which is directed to be filed within a week. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
Statutory rights require a minimum seven-day response period under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, which was violated in this case.
Minimum time of seven days to be granted to the Assessee to file its reply to the show cause notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The Income Tax Officer failed to comply with mandatory response time requirements, violating the petitioner's right to due process under the Income Tax Act.
Notice issued without granting statutory time to respond violated the principles of natural justice, rendering the order invalid.
The court affirmed that taxpayers are entitled to adequate time to respond to notices under the Income Tax Act, and failure to consider timely responses constitutes a violation of statutory duties.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the right of the assessee to adequate time to respond to the Show Cause Notice and the exclusion of the period given to the assessee in computing t....
Petitioners are entitled to adequate time to respond to tax notices, and minimal delays in requests for adjournments, especially for residents abroad, should not result in dismissal of rights.
The statutory requirement of giving seven clear days for filing a response to a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 must be met, and the interpretation of relevant provisions as ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
