Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Geeta Kumari, Lady Const/GD CISF – Appellant
Versus
Director General, Central Industrial Security Force – Respondent
1. Vide the present petition, petitioner prays as under:
(a) To set aside the release order No.E-38028/I.C.P.Order/Admin.1/2022/8466 dated 18.04.2022 issued by the respondents qua petitioner;
(b) To issue directions to the respondents for allowing petitioner to continue to perform her duties at CISF Unit, IGI Airport, New Delhi.
2. On the last date of hearing, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner requested this Court that if the transfer order is kept in abeyance for an year or so; thereafter, she will join wherever posting is given to her by the respondents.
3. Accordingly, counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that transfer order of the petitioner is deferred upto 31.03.2023. To this effect, communication has already been issued which has been received by the counsel for the petitioner.
4. In view of above, present petition along with pending applications stand disposed of.
Transfer orders can be deferred by the court to uphold fairness when a valid claim is presented by the affected employee.
The court emphasized the importance of communication from the respondents and provided the petitioner with the option to challenge the decision if aggrieved.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondents deciding the petitioner's representation and communicating the decision with a reasoned order, in line with the petitioner's request for retenti....
Authorities must decide representations timely and fairly, adhering to principles of administrative justice.
The court emphasized the duty of authorities to decide pending representations in a timely manner, confirming jurisdiction to compel action under Article 226.
Timely decision on representations and communication of reasoned orders by the respondents.
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making on representations made by petitioners.
The court emphasized the importance of passing a reasoned order on the petitioner's representation and providing specific relief to the petitioner.
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making on the petitioner's representation and the stay of any movement order until the representation is decided.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondent deciding the petitioner's representation and communicating the decision with a reasoned order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
