SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Mohan Bir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurmukh Singh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed under article 227 against previous court orders. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's arguments on cross-examination rights. (Para 2)
3. respondent's contention on petitioner's absence. (Para 3)
4. court's observation on the petitioner's absence. (Para 4)
5. court grants final chance for cross-examination. (Para 5 , 6)
6. details on the order's implementation and disposal. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the accused before the learned Trial Court, being aggrieved by the orders of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (West), Tis Hazari Courts, dated 23rd November, 2021, declining to interfere with the orders of the learned Trial Court dated 21st February, 2018 and 20th February, 2019 closing the opportunity of the petitioner to cross-examine the respondent/complainant.

2. Mr. Sundeep Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the learned Trial Court, as also the learned Additional Sessions Judge, had passed the orders only taking into consideration the past conduct of the petitioner, without noticing that the petitioner had been granted only one opportunity to cross-ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top