SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vipin Sanghi, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Punjab and Sind Bank - Appellant
Versus
Oberoi Cars Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
LPA 308 of 2022
Decided On : 09-05-2022




The enforceability of One-Time Settlement agreements is not contingent upon the source of repayment, affirming that a bank cannot unilaterally alter the terms of an OTS post-acceptance of payment.

Headnote:(A) One-Time Settlement (OTS) Policy - Legal principles regarding the enforcement of OTS agreements and conditions for repayment under OTS are established. (Paras 1-17)

(B) Consent and terms of OTS - Enforceability of OTS agreements does not depend on the means of payment as long as the payment is made. (Paras 3-17)

Facts of the case:
The appellant challenged the Single Judge's order directing the return of Title Deeds of mortgaged properties after respondents defaulted on One-Time Settlement payments due to pandemic-related delays. The respondents had made payments totaling Rs.20 crore against a Rs.20 crore settlement. The appellant initially required sale of properties to secure payment but subsequently accepted payments from other sources.

Findings of Court:
The Court affirmed that the OTS terms could not be revisited as it was neither misleading nor misrepresented by respondents regarding their means of payment.

Issues: The main questions included whether the respondents' payment through means other than property sale violated OTS terms and if the appellant could unilaterally change the OTS conditions after accepting alternative payments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the payment source does not affect the OTS agreement's enforceability, emphasizing that OTS conditions cannot be altered unilaterally by the bank once payments have been accepted.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 22120/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

LPA 308/2022 & CM APPL. 22121/2022

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and order dated 26.04.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) 12042 of 2021, allowing the writ petition filed by the respondents herein, and directing the appellant to return the original Title Deeds of the mortgaged properties, bearing number 7th Kilometer stone, Moradabad-Kashipur Road, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand, admeasuring approximately 6.5 acres, and C - 12, Sector - 1, Noida, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter collectively referred to as the 'mortgaged properties') to the respondents within a period of two weeks.

2. The respondents had filed the above mentioned writ petition praying for a writ of mandamus to the appellant herein to extend the timelines of One-Time Settlement (hereinafter referred to as the 'OTS') dated 09.03.2021, till 31.03.2022, and for restraining the appellant from cancelling the OTS on account of delay in payment of the amount by the respondents.

3. It was the case of the respondents that:

(a) the respondents had approached the appellant for an OTS for their loan accounts for a sum of Rs.20,00,00,000/- (Rupees twenty crore). The same was approved by the appellant/Bank vide sanction letter dated 09.03.2021.

(b) The respondents have paid a sum of Rs.6,00,00,000/- (Rupees six crore) out of Rs.20,00,00,000/- (Rupees twenty crore) to the appellant till 31.03.2021. However, due to the sudden outbreak of the Covid - 19 pandemic, the respondents requested the appellant to extend the time period for the payment of the next tranche of Rs.7,00,00,000/- (Rupees seven crore), which was to be paid by 30.06.2021, after selling the mortgaged properties.

(c) The respondents arranged for and deposited Rs.4,80,00,000/- (Rupees four crore eighty lakh) with the appellant by 30.06.2021, leaving a balance of Rs.2,20,00,000/- (Rupees two crore twenty lakhs) that was to be paid by 30.06.2021. As the appellant was seeking payment thereof, the respondents filed a writ petition, being WP(C) 8968 of 2021, before this Court seeking extension of timelines for payment under the OTS till 31.03.2022.

(d) A learned Single Judge of this Court, by its Order dated 03.09.2021, dismissed the said petition as withdrawn on the statement made by the respondents that they shall be submitting a revised proposal to the appellant/Bank.

(e) The respondents thereafter, vide their letter dated 08.09.2021, sought an extension of time for making the payment of the balance amount of Rs.9,20,00,000/- (Rupees nine crore twenty lakh). The said request was, however, rejected by the appellant/Bank vide its letter dated 21.09.2021.

(f) The respondents thereafter preferred another writ petition, being WP(C) 11099 of 2021, before this Court. The said petition was, however, withdrawn by them vide order dated 29.09.2021.

(g) The respondents thereafter made a further payment of Rs.2,20,00,000/- (Rupees two crore twenty lakh) to the appellant on 29.09.2021, and preferred an application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the learned DRT') seeking an extension of time to make the balance payment. The respondents made a further payment of Rs.3,60,00,000/- (Rupees three crore sixty lakh) to the appellant on 07.10.2021, leaving a balance amount of Rs.3,40,00,000/- (Rupees three crore forty lakh) to be paid.

(h) As the application filed by the respondents before the learned DRT could not be heard by the learned DRT, the respondents filed the abovementioned writ petition, being WP(C) 12042 of 2021, before this Court.

4. By an Order dated 26.10.2021 passed in the above writ petition, the learned Single Judge directed that subject to the respondents depositing a f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top