Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
KEI Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Raman Kwatra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of trademark infringement claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. defendants' claim of prior rights to the trademark. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. plaintiff's rebuttal of defendants' arguments. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. analysis of trademark registrations and rights. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 5. court's finding on deceptive similarity and infringement. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 6. defendant's honest and concurrent user defense examined. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 7. court's decision on probable success of plaintiff. (Para 50) |
| 8. conclusion granting injunction against defendants. (Para 51 , 52) |
JUDGMENT
I.A.287/2021 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC)
1. KEI Industries Ltd, the plaintiff, alleges infringement, by the defendants, of its registered trademark "KEI", of which it has registration both as a word mark and as the 
device mark. Accordingly, the plaint seeks a decree of permanent injunction, restraining the defendants from infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks either physically or via online platforms, along with other prayers for renditi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
