SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Pardeep – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges medical examination findings. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court observes tattoo but notes no other defects. (Para 3 , 6)
3. respondent argues tattoo violates recruitment guidelines. (Para 5)
4. petitioner permitted to reapply after tattoo removal. (Para 7)
5. dismissal of the petition with directions given. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the findings of the Detailed Medical Examination dated 21.04.2022 and the Review Medical Examination dated 22.04.2022 for the post of Sub-Inspector in Delhi Police and Central Armed Police Forces Examination 2020 or respondents may be directed to conduct fresh Detailed Medical Examination for the petitioner; quashing of the Tattoo Policy as contained in Clause 11.12 of the Sub-Inspector in Delhi Police and Central Armed Police Forces Examination 2020 to the extent that it fails to differentiate between the very appearance of the tattoo i.e. how light or dark it is and how visible it actually is.

2. Case of petitioner is that petitioner was found unfit in Detailed Medical Examination dated 21.04.2022 and thereafter, in Review Medical Examinati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top