SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Shubham Sharma - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 15302 of 2022 & CM Appl. 47481 of 2022(stay)
Decided On : 09-11-2022




Uniform recruitment guidelines prohibit tattoos on the saluting arm, impacting a candidate's eligibility; however, the court allows a candidate to seek re-evaluation after tattoo removal.

Headnote:(A) Office Memorandum dated 20.05.2015 - Revised uniform guidelines for recruitment medical examination - Petitioner's request to quash unfitness memorandum and seek appointment for Constable GD based on a medical examination - Found unfit due to a tattoo on the saluting arm, which is not permissible - Petitioner is willing to remove the tattoo. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Medical fitness for recruitment - Guidelines prohibit tattoos on the saluting hand, impacting recruit eligibility - Court's intervention allows petitioner to seek re-evaluation post-tattoo removal. (Paras 6-7)

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks quashing of unfitness memorandum. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents argue tattoo is not permissible. (Para 4)
3. petitioner can remove tattoo and re-apply. (Para 5 , 6)
4. petition disposed with directions. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. By way of the present petition, petitioner seeks quashing of Memorandum of unfitness dated 28.09.2022/29.09.2022 issued by respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and directions to the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Constable (GD) in Central Armed Police Forces, NIA, SSR and Rifleman GD in Assam Rifles Examination, 2021.

2. Case of petitioner is that petitioner was found unfit in Detailed Medical Examination dated 28.09.2022 and thereafter, in Review Medical Examination dated 29.09.2022 for the post of CT/GD in Central Armed Police Force Examination, NIA, SSR and Rifleman GD in Assam Rifles Examination, 2021 on the ground that petitioner has a religious tattoo marks on the dorsum of right hand (1.5*1.5cm) which is not permissible.

3. Notice issued.

4. Learned counsel for respondents accepts notice and has opposed the present petition by submitting that right arm is saluting hand and therefore, this tattoo is not permissible as per the Office Memorandum dated 20.05.2015 issued by respondent no.2/Ministry of Home Affairs regarding revised uniform guidelines for recruitment medical examination.

5. On enquiry from the petitioner, this Court has been told that the petitioner is willing to remove the said tattoo on the right arm and that the same can be removed by a minor laser surgery. This Court also finds from the Detailed Medical Examination dated 28.09.2022 and the Review Medical Examination dated 29.09.2022 that barring the said tattoo, there were no other defects found in the petitioner.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid position as well as in the interest of justice, we hereby dispose of the present petition by giving liberty to the petitioner to appear before the freshly constituted Medical Board of the respondents after two weeks from today after having the tattoo in the dorsum of the right hand removed and in case the petitioner is found fit by the said Medical Board, the respondents shall further process the selection of petitioner for the post in question in accordance with law.

7. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition stands disposed of.

8. Pending application also stands disposed of.

Copy of this order be given dasti under Signatures of Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top