SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Chandra Prabha Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Sharma – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition invokes article 227 against transfer order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. confusion over party identity in transferred suits. (Para 4 , 5)
3. section 24 of cpc does not require identical parties. (Para 6 , 7)
4. conflicting tenant relationships in two suits. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. two conflicting suits must be handled by one court. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. examining precedent that emphasizes case consolidation. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
7. current case findings conflict with previous rulings. (Para 22 , 23)
8. limits of judicial review under article 227 discussed. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
9. history of judgments detailing scope of article 227. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
10. supervisory power of courts outlined. (Para 30 , 31)
11. dismissal of petition and maintenance of discretion. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails an order dated 12th April, 2022, passed by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge ("the learned Pr. D & SJ") in Misc. No. 187/2022 (Praveen Sharma & Anr. v. Chander Prabha & Ors).

2. By the said order, the learned Pr. D & SJ has transferred CS 516/2021 (Chander Prabha Mahaj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top