SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAJMI WAZIRI, SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Ravi Raj – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Najmi Waziri, J. (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).

1. The petitioners impugn the order/judgment of the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi ('Tribunal') passed on 15.03.2019 in OA No.3528/2017; they seek issuance of a direction to the respondents to prepare, maintain and operate a Reserve Panel/Wait List apropos the recruitment process conducted by way of Combined Higher Secondary Level (10+2) Examination-2015; and consider the petitioners for appointment, by making appropriate recommendations to the various Cadres in accordance with their respective Merit Positions and to assign them all consequential benefits.

2. In essence, the issue before the court is whether any obligation exists on the part of Union of India to seek details of unfilled vacancies after the initial list of successful candidates (prepared/recommended by it) gets exhausted, and to offer appointments to persons, in the order of merit, from the same selection against the said unfilled vacancies.

3. The facts leading to the present petition are that, the petitioners had applied for recruitment in Combined Higher Se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top