SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Vivek Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General, Delhi High Court – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioners have filed the present petitions impugning the final answer keys of the Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination, which was declared after considering the objections raised by various candidates. According to the petitioners, answers to certain questions are not the appropriate answers and therefore, evaluation of the answer sheets is flawed.

2. The petitioners have been unsuccessful in being short-listed to appear for the Delhi Judicial Service Mains Examination as the marks secured by them in the preliminary examination fall short of the specified threshold. The petitioners state that if they are awarded the marks in respect of certain questions, which they claim were the most appropriate answers but were evaluated otherwise, they would clear the threshold of marks necessary to be eligible to appear for the main examination. The petitioners also claim that certain questions are erroneous and therefore, all candidates must be granted marks for the same.

3. The petitioners impugn the list of short-listed candidates and pray that the same be modified on the basis of re-evaluation of the answer key. The final answer keys for the `Qu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top