SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 702

SAMEER JAIN
Nidhi Choudhary, D/o. Shri Rajendra Singh Bhamu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj Department (Elementary Education) Government Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Vigyan Shah with Mr. Akshit Gupta, Mr. Harendra Neel, Mr. Pulkit Bhardwaj, Ms. Pragya Seth, Ms. Sarah Sharma, Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, Mr. Aamir Khan, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Mr. Raghunandan Sharma with Mr. Nikhil Kumawat, Ms. Komal Kumari Giri, Mr. Bajrang Sepat, Mr. Prateek Kasliwal with Ms. Gauri Jasana, Mr. Suresh Khileri with Mr. Kapil Khandelwal, Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki, Mr. Shivatma Kumar Tank, Ms. Neha Godara, Mr. Almas Khanam, Mr. Narendra Kumar Saini.
For the Respondents:Mr. R. N. Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Jain, Mr. Rishiraj Maheshwari, Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG with Mr. Naveen Yadav, Mr. Kapil Vyas, Mr. Jai Vardhan Joshi, Mr. Nalin G. Narain, AGC with Mr. Arpit Jain, Mr. Manish Bhardwaj, Ms. Apoorva Agarwal, Mr. Yashraj Kasliwal, Mr. Girraj P Sharma, Mr. Prahlad Sharma with Ms. Kajol Swami, Mr. Sanjay Mahla with Ms. Sunita Mahla, Mr. Nagendra Sharma, Mr. Narendra Singh Choudhary.

ORDER :

(Sameer Jain, J.) :

1. In the present batch of writ petitions, the scope of the controversy involved, albeit not limited to but is broadly and predominantly defined by the challenge raised regarding the correctness and/or validity of the final answer key dated 26.05.2023, as issued by the respondent-Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (hereinafter, RSSB), pursuant to the invitation of objection(s) from the applicants/candidates as against the preliminary answer key published on 18.03.2023.

2. Therefore, considering the fact that the writ petitions warrant adjudication on common questions of law; with the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the parties, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10358/2023 titled as Nidhi Choudhary and Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors, is being taken up as the lead case. It is cautiously clarified that discrepancies in the present batch of writ petitions, if any, pertain purely to the factual narratives contained therein and not viz-a-viz the questions of law to be determined by this Court.

3. The overarching factual matrix, enveloping the lis to be determined by this Court, is noted herein-under:-

3.1 That the respondent no.5-RSSB issued a

                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  8
                  9
                  10
                  11
                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                  supreme today icon
                  logo-black

                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                  Please visit our Training & Support
                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                  qr

                  Scan Me!

                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                  whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                  whatsapp-icon Back to top