SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
Shanti Devi - Appellant
Versus
BSES Yamuna Power Limited - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9032 of 2022 & CM Appl. 27174 of 2022
Decided On : 02-06-2022




The court permits granting of an electricity connection despite pending litigation, emphasizing that no rights or possessory claims are recognized by this order.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Petition seeking a direction for electricity connection - Petitioner claims ownership on basis of adverse possession, following pending civil suit against him - Respondent agrees to grant connection provided dues are cleared and application made - Court clarifies that order is without prejudice to any rights or contentions and does not recognize tenancy rights - Petitioner must pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- in addition to regular security deposit and comply with all requirements. (Paras 1-6)

Findings of Court:
The application for electricity connection is to be processed within two working days once the petitioner fulfills all formalities.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was whether the respondent should grant electricity connection to the petitioner without a NOC from the landlord amid ongoing litigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while the connection may be granted, this does not confer any rights to the petitioner against the pending suit or recognized possession.

Result: Petition disposed of with specific instructions for connection.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks electricity connection amidst ownership claim. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondent's conditions for connection grant. (Para 4)
3. court's directives for granting connection and clarifications. (Para 5 , 6)
4. final disposal of the writ petition. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent/BSES Yamuna Power Limited to install a new electricity connection in the name of petitioner at the property bearing No. 18/40, Top Floor, East Patel Nagar Delhi-110008.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one Rajni Babber has filed a civil suit bearing No. Civil/DJ/611125/2016 for possession, permanent & mandatory injunction and recovery of mesne profit against the petitioner, which is pending consideration before the concerned District Judge. He submits that the petitioner has claimed ownership on the basis of adverse possession. He further submits that earlier the electricity connection was existing in the name of Ms. Rajni Babber, which has been disconnected and the petitioner has now sought a new electricity connection.

3. Issue notice.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/BSES Yamuna Power Limited accepts notice and submits that the landlord had filed a suit for possession against the petitioner and objected to grant of electricity connection in his name. He, however, submits that the answering respondent has no objection in granting electricity connection in the name of the petitioner, provided the petitioner clears the pending electricity dues, if any, in respect of the above connection and further makes a fresh application and further subject to payment of additional security deposit over and above the regular security deposit.

5. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of in the following terms:

(i) Petitioner shall make an application for grant of a fresh electricity connection in his own name.

(ii) The respondent shall process petitioner's application for installation of a fresh electricity connection without insisting on a NOC from the owner.

(iii) Petitioner, shall comply with all the codal and commercial requirements of the respondent/BSES Yamuna Power Limited.

(iv) Petitioner shall also deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the respondent/BSES Yamuna Power Limited in addition to the regular security deposit that the petitioner is required to make under the rules or regulations.

(v) Petitioner shall pay the consumption charges in accordance with the bills raised by the respondent/BSES Yamuna Power Limited from time to time.

(vi) Petitioner shall not seek adjustment of the security deposit. However, on the petitioner vacating the premises or being evicted and surrender of the electricity meter, petitioner shall be entitled to refund of the security deposit subject to adjustment of any dues of the respondent.

(vii) The respondent shall be entitled to disconnect the electricity supply in case petitioner fails to pay the electricity charges.

(viii) Application of the petitioner shall be processed and electricity connection shall be installed within two working days of the petitioner completing all the formalities.

6. It is clarified that this order is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and shall not be construed as recognising any tenancy or possessory rights of the petitioner with regard to the subject property and would be without prejudice to the pending dispute with the landlord. No special equities shall flow in favour of the petitioner because of this order.

7. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms alongwith the pending application.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top