SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
Mohd. Kasim - Appellant
Versus
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited - Respondent
W.P.(C) 7839 of 2022
Decided On : 14-07-2022




A petition under Article 226 can direct the installation of utilities, subject to formal requirements and does not confer ownership rights.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Petition for electricity connection - The petitioner, as owner/occupant, sought the allotment of an electricity meter connection, which was initially denied due to objections from a relative. The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application, comply with requirements, and clarified that the order does not recognize ownership rights. (Paras 1, 5, 6)

(B) Petitioner's obligations - The petitioner is to pay all consumption charges and comply with all commercial requirements for connection. The connection shall be installed within two working days of formalities completion. (Paras 4, 5)

Table of Content
1. application for electricity connection based on ownership. (Para 1 , 2)
2. conditions for granting electricity connection. (Para 3 , 5 , 6)
3. respondent's acceptance contingent on fresh application. (Para 4)
4. writ petition disposed of. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction to respondent No.1/BSES to allot/install electricity meter connection in his name at Jhuggi bearing No. S-66/28, Pratap Camp, Nehru Nagar, New Delhi-110065 (hereinafter, referred to as the `subject property').

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the owner/occupant of the subject property, who had applied for an electricity connection in his name, however, the same has not been provided till date. It is further submitted that it has come to the knowledge of the petitioner that respondent No.2, who is his real uncle, had objected to the aforesaid grant of electricity connection. Learned counsel also submits that respondent No.2 used to own Jhuggi bearing No.S-66/24, Pratap Camp, Nehru Nagar, Near Gurudwara, New Delhi-110065, and electricity connection vide CA No.151970601, which on the sale of the said jhuggi was not transferred to the new owner and rather reported as stolen.

3. Issue notice.

4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1/BSES accepts notice and submits that the petitioner had preferred an application seeking electricity connection in respect of the subject property, however, the same was rejected. He further submits that a representation was received from respondent No.2/Mohd. Munif objecting to the grant of electricity connection in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel however, on instructions, also submits that the answering respondent has no objection to the grant of electricity connection in favour of the petitioner, provided he files fresh application in this regard.

5. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of in the following terms:

(i) Petitioner shall make an application for grant of a fresh prepaid electricity connection in his own name.

(ii) Petitioner shall comply with all the codal and commercial requirements of respondent No.1/BSES.

(iii) Petitioner shall pay the consumption charges in accordance with the bills raised by respondent No.1/BSES from time to time.

(iv) Petitioner shall not seek adjustment of the security deposit. However, on his vacating the premises or being evicted and surrender of the electricity meter, petitioner shall be entitled to refund of the security deposit subject to adjustment of any dues of respondent No.1/BSES.

(v) Respondent No.1 shall be entitled to disconnect the electricity supply in case the petitioner fails to pay the electricity charges.

(vi) Application of the petitioner shall be processed expeditiously, as and when filed, and electricity connection shall be installed within two working days of his completing all the formalities.

6. It is clarified that this order is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties/any other person and shall not be construed as recognising rights of any nature whatsoever, including ownership rights of the petitioner with regard to the subject property. The observations made hereinabove are prima facie in nature. As such, no special equities shall flow in favour of the petitioner on account of this order.

7. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top