SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Jaimeet Singh Kalra – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The present petition is filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as "the Code") for quashing of FIR bearing No. 167/2016 registered at PS Rajinder Nagar.

2. The petitioner no l and the respondent No.2 got married on 28.6.2015 according to Hindu rites and customs and out of their marriage one girl child namely Keerat was born on 19.4.2016 who is in the care and custody of respondent no 2. The petitioners no 2 to 5 are family members/relatives of the petitioner no 1 and are identified by the investigating officer. The respondent no 2 is also identified by the Investigating Officer. The matrimonial differences stated to be arisen between the petitioner no l and respondent no 2 and due to this reason they are living separately since 18.12.2015. The petitioner no 1 and the respondent no 2 initiated legal proceedings against each other. The petitioner no 1 filed a petition under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights titled as Jaimeet Kalra Vs. Gurdeep Kaur bearing no HMA No 261/16 which was pending in Family Court, Tis Hazari, Delhi. The petitioner no 2 filed a civil suit against the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top