Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Vineet Goel – Appellant
Versus
Rushmi Goel – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition under article 227 assailing order related to bank statements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. directions about filing bank statements in prior court orders. (Para 6) |
| 3. arguments related to timing and justification for document submission. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's rationale for not interfering with learned adj's decision. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. critique of the petitioner's vague application for document submission. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. analysis of petitioner's indolence in obtaining necessary documents. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 24) |
1. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails order dated 22nd December, 2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (the learned ADJ) in CS/DJ/NO. 577733/2016 (Vineet Goel v. Rushmi Goel & ors).
2. The petitioner was the plaintiff in the suit and the respondents were the defendants.
3. The impugned order has been passed on an application filed by the petitioner, as the plaintiff in the suit, to take the certified copies of the original bank statements of the plaintiff's account in the HSBC Bank on record.
4. The a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
