SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Vineet Goel – Appellant
Versus
Rushmi Goel – Respondent


ORDER (Oral)

1. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails order dated 22nd December, 2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (the learned ADJ) in CS/DJ/NO. 577733/2016 (Vineet Goel v. Rushmi Goel & ors).

2. The petitioner was the plaintiff in the suit and the respondents were the defendants.

3. The impugned order has been passed on an application filed by the petitioner, as the plaintiff in the suit, to take the certified copies of the original bank statements of the plaintiff's account in the HSBC Bank on record.

4. The application averred that the said documents were necessary to enable the plaintiff to appropriately prosecute the plaint.

5. The aforesaid documents were being sought to be placed on record by the plaintiff in compliance with the direction issued in para 5 of the order dated 19th March, 2015 passed by this Court in CS(OS) 1414/2010 which, consequent to enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction of the trial courts, was transferred and re-numbered as CS 577733/2016.

6. This Court had, in paras 4 and 5 of its order dated 19th March, 2015, noted and directed thus:

    "4. Having regard to the fact that the defendant no.2 ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top