Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Meena Kumari – Appellant
Versus
EDMC – Respondent
JUDGMENT
CM APPL. 28070/2022 (exemption) and CM APPL. 28071/2022 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The applications stand disposed of.
CM(M) 584/2022 & CM APPL. 28069/2022 (stay)
3. The petitioner, in this petition under Section 227 of the Constitution of India is aggrieved by the fact that the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge ("the learned ASCJ") has adjourned an application, filed by the petitioner with Civil Suit 252/2022 (Meena Kumari v. EDMC) seeking stay of the proposed demolition of the petitioner's premises on as many as seven occasions, without taking up the application for decision. In fact, on one occasion, i.e. 28th February, 2022, the earlier learned ASCJ passed the following order:
"28.02.2022
In terms of Hon'ble High Court Order, all the cases listed today are to be taken up through physical mode.
Present: Ms. Shachi Jain., Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Reena, JLO on behalf of EDMC.
Ms. Reena, JLO, on behalf of EDMC submits that summons of the suit has received through Whatsapp. A Spare copy of the plaint and documents is supplied to the JLO in the court today against acknowledgement.
An urgent prayer is made on behalf of plaintif
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
