IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Arvind Tripathi - Appellant
Versus
P.P. Singh - Respondent
TR.P.(C.) 40 of 2022
Decided On : 03-06-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer of suit based on jurisdiction. (Para 1) |
| 2. no objection to the transfer. (Para 2) |
| 3. order for transfer to appropriate court. (Para 3) |
| 4. placement of case for assignment. (Para 4) |
| 5. disposal of petition. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CM APPL.27635/2022 (exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
TR.P.(C.) 40/2022
1. Present petition has been filed for transfer of civil suit no. 6459 of 2016 titled Arvind Tripathi versus Mr P.P. Singh pending before Ms. Poja Talwar Additional District Judge, South District, Saket Court, New Delhi to the court of competent jurisdiction of Additional District Judge, South East District, New Delhi. It has been stated that South East District has the territorial jurisdiction.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states at bar that the learned counsel for the respondent has sent an e-mail dated 24.05.2022 giving `no objection'.
3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner at bar, Civil Suit No. 6459 of 2016 titled Arvind Tripathi versus Mr P.P. Singh pending before Ms. Poja Talwar Additional District Judge, South District, Saket Court, New Delhi be transferred to the court of competent jurisdiction of Additional District Judge, South East District, New Delhi.
4. Let the matter be placed before learned Principal & Sessions Judge South East District on 05th July, 2022 for assigning the matter to the Court of competent jurisdiction.
5. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of.
The court reaffirmed the significance of jurisdiction and the mutual consent of parties in the transfer of civil suits.
Territorial jurisdiction for civil suits must align with the current residence of the parties involved, allowing for efficient court proceedings.
Jurisdictional relevance is crucial for the transfer of civil suits, emphasizing the need for judicial efficiency without allowing delay tactics.
The court affirmed that transfer of cases should consider the interests of justice and efficiency, rejecting transfer on grounds of territorial jurisdiction when substantial judicial time has been in....
The High Court can transfer execution petitions within jurisdiction for judicial efficiency under Section 24 of the CPC and Article 227 of the Constitution.
The court may transfer a civil suit to the competent jurisdiction based on mutual agreement of the parties involved regarding territorial jurisdiction.
The court may transfer pending civil suits to avoid parallel proceedings and conflicting judgments regarding the same parties and subject matter, as per Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.