Pink City Expressway Private Limited vs National Highways Authority of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Pink City Expressway Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
National Highways Authority of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. establishment of contract extension and disputes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
2. appellant's arguments for contract extension. (Para 13)
3. respondent's objections to appellant's claims. (Para 14)
4. court's assessment of claims and judgments. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. conclusion and dismissal of appeal. (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 28396/2022 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

FAO(OS) (COMM) 158/2022 & CM APPL. 28395/2022 (Interim relief)

3. Present appeal arises from the impugned judgment dated 03.06.2022, passed by the learned Single Judge in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 166/2022 filed by the Appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act').

4. A brief narrative of the facts, to the extent necessary and relevant for disposal of the present appeal, is that the Appellant is a Special Purpose Vehicle promoted and incorporated specifically for the purpose of executing the work of Six-Laning of Gurgaon-Kotputli-Jaipur Section of NH-8 from KM 42.70 to KM 273.00 on Build, Operate and Transfer (`BOT')

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTJYOTI SINGH, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTAPink City Expressway Private Limited – AppellantVersusNational Highways Authority of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Pink City Expressway Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
National Highways Authority of India – Respondent