SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Amit Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J.

CRL.M.C. 1203/2021

1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 326/2018 under Sections 420/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Hauz Khas on the complaint of the respondent No. 2 on the ground that the parties had settled their disputes vide the MoU dated 8th September 2019. According to the petitioner, he has complied with the terms of settlement arrived at between the parties and statement of the respondent No. 2 through his father was also recorded before the learned Additional District Judge, South District, Saket Courts on 27th January 2020 in Suit No. 700/2018 filed by the respondent No. 2 titled `Anish Goel Vs. Amit Gupta' and based on the settlement, the petitioner withdrew a company petition filed by him on 21st October 2019, however, now the respondent No. 2 is not co-operating and coming forward to quash the FIR in question. The petitioner having complied with all his obligations as envisaged under the MoU dated 8th September 2019, the respondent No. 2 on one pretext or the other, cannot deny, no objection affidavit for the quashing of the above-noted FIR.

2. As per the case of the petitioner, the petitioner and the respondent No.



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top