Amit Goyal S/o Late Shri J.G. Goyal vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Del) 187

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Amit Goyal S/o Late Shri J.G. Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Amit Chadha, Jugal Bagga, Atin Chadha, Munisha Chadha, Harjas Singh Chhatwal, Dhruv Tomar
For the Respondents: Shoaib Haider, Govind Singh

Table of Content
1. nature and context of the property transaction (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 10)
2. introductions and assurances made in the property deal (Para 3 , 6 , 7)
3. execution of sale deeds and financial transactions (Para 5 , 8 , 9)
4. discovery of fraudulent activities and implications (Para 12 , 21 , 22 , 31)
5. defense by accused regarding accusations of forgery (Para 13 , 24 , 32)
6. settlement and court outcomes (Para 45 , 46 , 51)

JUDGMENT :

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. The aforesaid two Petitions have been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “CrPC”) on behalf of the Petitioners/Amit Goyal and Dharmender Yadav seeking quashing of FIR No. 229/2013 under Sections 420 /467/468/471/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “ IPC ”) registered at P.S. Uttam Nagar.

Case of the Complainant/Respondent No.2:

2. The brief facts of the case as per Respondent No.2/Complainant, Baldev Sapra, are that he has been manufacturing pressure cookers in his factory at Uttam Nagar, Delhi, for over 25 years. During this time, he developed close relations with local residents, including Petitioner/Dharmender Yadav, whom he had k