Anil Jain vs Paritosh Jain

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Anil Jain – Appellant
Versus
Paritosh Jain – Respondent

Table of Content
1. background on the partition of huf property. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. entitlement and ownership post-partition explained. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
3. legal heirs' claims assessed against prior partitions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
4. court's analysis on application of supreme court ruling. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
5. dismissal of applications for lack of locus. (Para 24)

JUDGMENT

I.A. 14007/2021 (Under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 of CPC for impleading Smt. Anita Jain being the legal heir and a coparcener of late Justice J.D. Jain and his HUF as proposed defendant No. 3 in the present suit)

This application has been filed under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the CPC, 1908 on behalf of the applicant/proposed defendant No. 3 seeking impleadment of Ms. Anita Jain, legal heir/daughter of late Justice J.D. Jain, (Retd.) claiming to be a coparcener of late Justice J.D. Jain, HUF as proposed defendant No. 3 in the present suit.

I.A. 13998/2021 (Under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 of CPC for impleading Sh. Rajneesh Chopra & Sh. Divyang Chopra as proposed defendant Nos. 4 & 5 of late Justice Aruna Suresh, Retd. in the present suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTNEENA BANSAL KRISHNAAnil Jain – AppellantVersusParitosh Jain – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Anil Jain – Appellant
Versus
Paritosh Jain – Respondent