SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
Sufiya Begum - Appellant
Versus
BSES Yamuna Power Limited - Respondent
W.P.(C) 10418 of 2022 and CM Appl. 30056 of 2022
Decided On : 11-07-2022




The court ruled that the installation of an electricity connection is contingent upon the applicant's compliance with codal requirements and does not confer ownership rights.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Petition for installation of electricity connection - Petitioner, claiming ownership of premises, sought installation of electricity connection, which was delayed due to deficiencies noted by the respondent - Court directed installation of connection upon fulfilling requirements, including payment of security deposit and adherence to regulations. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Rights and Contentions - Clarification issued that the order is without prejudice to the rights of the parties and does not recognize any ownership rights of the petitioner. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner purchased the premises in question through a registered sale deed and applied for a new electricity connection, which was delayed due to certain deficiencies.

Findings of Court:
The petition was disposed of with directions to comply with the codal and commercial requirements for the electricity connection.

Issues: The core issue was the installation of a new electricity connection in light of the petitioner’s claim of ownership and compliance with requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized compliance with all necessary formalities for the installation of the electricity connection and made it clear that the order does not recognize any ownership rights.

Result: Petition disposed of with specific directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's entitlement for electricity connection (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directives for electricity connection installation (Para 3 , 5 , 6)
3. deficiencies in petitioner's request acknowledged (Para 4)
4. writ petition dismissed as settled (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (ORAL)

1. By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who claims herself to be the owner/occupier of the premises bearing No. 1236 to 1238, Fourth Floor, Ganj Meer Khan, Rakab Ganj, New Delhi - 110002 (hereinafter, referred to as the `subject premises') seeks a direction to the respondent to install a new electricity connection at the subject premises.

2. Mr. Kshitiz Mahipal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has purchased the subject premises by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 06.11.2020 from one Smt. Heena Fatama. It is submitted that the petitioner has approached the respondent for installation of a new electricity connection vide Application No. 8005636348, however the same has not been installed till date.

3. Issue notice.

4. Mr. Akhil Hasija, learned counsel appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/BSES Yamuna Power Limited and, on advance instructions, submits that the petitioner's request was considered and certain deficiencies were pointed out. He, on instructions, submits that a technical site inspection would be carried out at the subject premises and the petitioner's request for installation of a new electricity connection would be considered in accordance with law.

5. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of in the following terms:

(i) Petitioner shall make an application for grant of a fresh electricity connection in her own name.

(ii) Petitioner shall comply with all the codal and commercial requirements of respondent/BSES Yamuna Power Limited.

(iii) Petitioner shall also deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with respondent/BSES Yamuna Power Limited in addition to the regular security deposit that the petitioner is required to make under the rules or regulations.

(iv) Petitioner shall pay the consumption charges in accordance with the bills raised by respondent/BSES Yamuna Power Limited from time to time.

(v) Petitioner shall not seek adjustment of the security deposit. However, on the petitioner vacating the premises or being evicted and surrender of the electricity meter, petitioner shall be entitled to refund of the security deposit subject to adjustment of any dues of the respondent.

(vi) The respondent shall be entitled to disconnect the electricity supply in case petitioner fails to pay the electricity charges.

(vii) Application of the petitioner shall be processed and electricity connection shall be installed within two working days of the petitioner completing all the formalities.

6. It is clarified that this order is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties/any other person and shall not be construed as recognizing rights of any nature whatsoever, including the ownership rights of the petitioner with regard to the subject premises. No special equities shall flow in favour of the petitioner on account of this order.

7. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top