SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Buildmyinfra Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Gyan Prakash Mishra – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of dispute and agreement. (Para 1 , 2)
2. claim of violation by respondent. (Para 3 , 4)
3. invocation of arbitration clause. (Para 5 , 6)
4. arguments against arbitration. (Para 8 , 14)
5. court's reasoning on jurisdiction and agreement validity. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 13)
6. rejection of respondent's defenses. (Para 11 , 15)
7. conclusion and appointment of arbitrator. (Para 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)--By way of this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ["the Act"], the petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising between the parties under a "Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreement" ["the Agreement"] dated 01.07.2019.

2. The contention of the petitioner, which is engaged in the business of providing industrial solutions, is that it issued an offer letter dated 10.07.2018 to the respondent to join its employment and the respondent accepted the same and joined the employment of the petitioner on 17.07.2018. Following his appointment, the respondent signed the Agreement dated 01.07.2019. The recital to the Agreement notes that the respondent was designated as the Project Head

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top