SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Chem Academy Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Malik – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appointment of arbitrator under faculty agreement. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. disputes over agreement breaches and arbitration initiation. (Para 5 , 6)
3. non-arbitrability arguments and judicial review. (Para 8 , 9 , 12)
4. court's view on claims' arbitrability and referral to arbitration. (Para 11 , 13 , 14)
5. appointment direction and rights left open. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)--By way of this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ["the Act"], the petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties under the "Faculty Agreement" dated 08.09.2021 ["the Agreement"]. By way of the said Agreement, the respondent was appointed as a member of faculty of the petitioner's institution which offers online and offline classes to students.

2. Notice of the petition was issued on 27.05.2022. Mr. Lakshay Joshi, learned counsel, has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. Although the respondent has failed to file a reply to the petition pursuant to the liberty granted by the order dated 27.05.2022, Mr. Joshi sought to resist the petition on the grounds discussed in detail later i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top