SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
Prayag Polytech Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 1591 of 2022
Decided On : 22-07-2022




A One Time Settlement in banking requires timely compliance from the debtor, but upon acceptance of payment by cheque, the bank must honor its obligations without delay, irrespective of cheque clearance timing.

Headnote:(A) Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Section 13 - One Time Settlement Scheme - The petitioner, having made payments under an OTS, contended the account closure was unjustly delayed by the respondent bank despite full payment being made on the stipulated last date. The respondent claimed the payment wasn’t valid as it was credited late. The court determined that the cheque payment was valid and accepted, and that the bank's inaction constituted arbitrary refusal to acknowledge compliance to OTS terms. (Paras 12, 19)

(B) Contractual Obligations - An OTS agreement, once accepted and payments initiated, should be honored by the financial institution without undue delay or arbitrary refusal. (Paras 18, 20)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner company, after their financial constraints, accepted an OTS for their declared NPA account, paying the full amount by the deadline via a cheque, which was later accepted but not credited until after the deadline.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner had duly complied with the payment terms of the OTS scheme and rejected the bank's argument concerning the timing of cheque encashment.

Issues: The main issues were whether the payment timing affected the validity of the OTS and the bank's obligation to issue a no-dues certificate post-payment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the unconditional acceptance of the cheque constituted compliance with the OTS terms, rejecting claims of non-compliance by the bank.

Result: Petition allowed; the bank directed to issue a no-dues certificate.

Table of Content
1. petitioner company's obligations and sbi's actions regarding ots. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. sbi's argument regarding the non-compliance with payment deadlines. (Para 10)
3. court's analysis of compliance with ots agreement. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19)
4. court's rejection of sbi's claims regarding cheque encashment. (Para 14 , 18)
5. court's order for sbi to issue no-dues certificate. (Para 20)
6. final ruling: petition allowed. (Para 21)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.32079/2022 (seeking condonation of delay in filing counter affidavit)

1. For the grounds and reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of. The counter affidavit filed on 19th July, 2022 is taken on record.

W.P.(C) 1591/2022

2. Briefly stated, Petitioner No. 1 - Prayag Polytech Private Limited had availed credit facilities from Respondent - State Bank of India ("SBI"). Subsequently, somewhere in 2018, after deterioration of Petitioner- company's financial condition and non-availability of funds, SBI declared Petitioner-company's account to be a Non-Performing Asset ("NPA") and initiated proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal ("DRT").1

3. In the meantime, on 28th October, 2020, SBI sent a communication to Petitioner-company informing it of a One Time Settlement ("OTS") scheme of NPAs and offered to settle the total outstanding amount i.e., Rs.7,15,72,836/- for Rs.2,29,51,380.10/-. The said proposal was discussed by the board of Petitioner-company in its meeting held on 10th November, 2020 and the acceptance was conveyed to SBI on 11th November, 2020.

4. Thereafter, SBI issued a letter dated 24th November, 2020 [hereinafter, "sanction letter"], setting-out the terms of the OTS. Since the controversy revolves around the construction of the said terms, for quick reference, the same are reproduced hereinbelow:

    "Scheme for One Time Settlement of NPAs & AUCAs (Sill OTS 2020)

    We refer to your letter no. NIL dated 11.11.2020 for settlement of your dues to the Bank under the captioned scheme. We are pleased to advise that your application under the captioned scheme has been accepted by the appropriate authority.

    1. OTS amount payable under the OTS Scheme will be Rs.2,29,51,380,10 Only.

    2. Application money of Rs.11,47,570.00 paid by you will be appropriated towards your OTS amount.

    3. Another 10% of the OTS Amount will have to be deposited by you as first instalment within thirty days from the date of sanction of OTS failing which the OTS sanction will be rendered infructuous and OTS treated as failed.

    4. Another 10% of the OTS Amount will have to be deposited by you as second instalment of money within sixty days from the date of sanction of OTS failing which the OTS sanction will be rendered infructuous and OTS treated as failed.

    5. The balance amount can he paid within 8 months from the date of this letter, i.e. 24/11/2020 (the validity period) together with interest @ 6 Months MCLR on reducing balance basis effective from the date of this letter, i.e. 24.11.2020 failing which the OTS sanction will be rendered infructuous.

    6. However, no interest will be charged if the entire OTS amount is paid within 6 months from the date of this letter, i.e. 24/11/2020.

    7. You will be eligible for an additional incentive on the OTS amount, on making payment of the entire OTS amount as given below:

    A:

Full payment of OTS amount byIncentive on full payment of OTS Amount
Within one month from the date of sanction.15%
Within two months from the date of sanction.10%
By 31.03.20215%

    B. Incentive on 50% payment of OTS Amount:

50% payment of OTS amount byIncentive on full payment of OTS Amount
Within one month from the date of sanction.7.5%
Within two months from the date of sanction5%"

[Emphasis Supplied]

5. In terms of the above-extracted conditions no. 5 & 6, the OTS amount of Rs.2,29,51,380.10/- could have been paid either (i) within six months without interest from the date of the sanction letter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top