SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, AMIT SHARMA
Suman Pujari (Dr.) – Appellant
Versus
Registrar Co-operative Societies, Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amit Sharma J. The present writ petitions under Articles 226 read with Article 227 read with Article 14 read with Article 300A of the Constitution of India involves a dispute with respect to an allotment of Flat No. B-29, Prem Kutir Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. (respondent no.2 in both the petitions). With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the said writ petitions were taken up for final hearing and are being disposed of vide this common judgment.

2. In order to appreciate the issue involved in the present matter, following facts, spanning nearly three decades, are relevant for deciding the present subject dispute involved in the aforesaid writ petitions. The following facts are being culled out from the Counter affidavit filed by respondent No. 4 (Dr. Suman Pujari) in W.P. (C) No. 1647/2015;-

(i) That on 21.01.1990, respondent no. 4 applied for membership of respondent no.2 society and deposited Rs.110/- towards admission fee and share money with application form and Rs.75,000/- towards cost of construction and land money.

(ii) Thereafter, on 09.09.1990, respondent no.2 society conferred membership no. 143 to respondent no.4 against resignation of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top