Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Dewan Chand Builders and Contractors – Appellant
Versus
Rayco Engineering Services – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition under article 227 against lower court orders (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discontent regarding amount calculation by adj (Para 3) |
| 3. liberty to contest calculations with no court view (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. petition disposed of with no costs (Para 8) |
1. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against orders dated 1st July, 2022 and 8th July, 2022, passed by the learned Additional District Judge (the learned ADJ) in Execution No. 107/18 (Rayco Engineering Services v. Dewan Chand Builders & Contractors).
2. A reading of the two orders indicates that, vide the order dated 1st July, 2022, the learned ADJ adjourned the proceedings to 8th July, 2022, and vide the order dated 8th July, 2022, he adjourned the matter further to 8th August, 2022.
3. There are certain observations contained in the order dated 8th July, 2022 regarding the calculation of the amount payable to the decree holder. Mr. Kang, learned Counsel for the petitioner (the judgment debtor) expresses reservations against the said calculation.
4. Inasmuch as the learned ADJ has merely adjourned the proceedings, albeit with the aforesaid observations, I do
A court under Article 227 will not interfere in adjourned proceedings unless there are compelling reasons. The parties retain the right to resolve disputes before the original judge.
When an appeal lies against a decree in civil court, a petition under Article 227 is not maintainable, emphasizing the necessity to use available remedies.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the availability of an appeal remedy under the CPC operates as a near total bar to the exercise of jurisdiction by the court under article 227....
The court emphasized the importance of respectful discourse in legal proceedings and criticized adverse remarks about Counsel's language as excessive, asserting that courts should avoid unnecessary s....
An arbitrator's costs can be challenged if deemed excessive, particularly when justified reasons for adjournments are presented.
The court affirmed that jurisdiction and suit valuations must be based solely on amended pleadings in accordance with procedural laws, rejecting external assertions not contained in the plaint.
The executing court is bound to execute a decree as it stands, and objections to its execution must be based on jurisdictional issues rather than claims of error in the decree's interpretation.
Unconscionable laches can bar relief in petitions under Article 227; courts will not interfere unless there are grave abuses or derelictions.
Repeated petitions under Article 227 intended to thwart execution process are deemed frivolous; execution petition maintainable if sufficient court fees paid.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
