SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Scholastic India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kanta Batra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. These are cross appeals under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the `A&C Act') impugning an order dated 17.08.2020 (hereafter the `impugned order') passed by the learned Additional Commercial Judge. By the impugned order, the learned Court allowed the application filed by Scholastic India Pvt. Ltd. [the appellant in FAO (COMM) 112/2022, hereafter referred to as `Scholastic'] under Section 34 of the A&C Act impugning an arbitral award dated 05.09.2017 (hereafter the `impugned award').

2. The disputes between the parties arise in connection with a Lease Deed dated 08.03.2013 (hereafter the `Lease Deed') in respect of a property bearing "Killa No. 6/1, admeasuring 6 kanals 9 marlas, falling in rectangle No. 24, Khewat Khata No. 1821209, situated at Village Gopalpur, District Gurgaon, Haryana alongwith built up structure admeasuring 25,000 sq. ft" (hereafter the `premises').

3. In terms of the Lease Deed, Smt. Kanta Batra [the Appellant in FAO (COMM) 71/2021 and hereafter referred to as the `Lessor'] had leased the premises to Scholastic for a period of three years commencing from 01.03.2013 till 28.02.2016. In ter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top