Judicial review of disciplinary decisions is limited to procedural fairness; evidence supporting misconduct must be acknowledged, and findings will not be overturned unless shown to be perverse.

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The Petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the Order dated 13.05.2011, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT) in O.A. No. 2725/2009 by which the Original Application challenging the order of punishment dated 26.08.2008 and the order rejecting the appeal was dismissed.

2. The facts of the case reveal that the petitioner who, at the relevant point of time was serving as Sub Inspector of Police was subjected to disciplinary proceedings along with one Om Prakash Ahlawat. The allegations leveled against the petitioner and Om Prakash Ahlawat reveal that while posted at Police Station Paschim Vihar they detained Smt. Santosh Jain and Smt. Anita Jain along with her two minor children in the absence of any male family member of the family. The action was taken by the petitioner as well as Om Prakash Ahlwat based upon a complaint of Smt. Meenu Jain dated 03.05.2002. The facts further reveal that ignoring the earlier complaint of Smt. Santosh Jain dated 02.05.2002 and her PCR calls, action was taken against her. The charges further reveal that Smt. Santosh Jain and her daughter-in-law and minor children were detained in the Police Station from 9:30 A.M. to 3:30 P.M. on 05.05.2002. They were allegedly humiliated and threatened to vacate the house. The facts further reveal that on account of the detention and harassment, Smt. Santosh Jain fell sick and she was hospitalized at Muni Maya Ram Jain Hospital, Pitampura from 05.05.2002 at 06:00 P.M. to 06.05.2002 at 10:00 P.M.

3. It is further alleged that on 05.05.2002, the Petitioner accompanied Smt. Meenu Jain to Flat No. GH-9/149, Paschim Vihar in the absence of the owner Smt. Santosh Jain and her family and permitted her to take possession of the house by breaking the locks.

4. The allegations further reveal that on 06.05.2002, the petitioner also got an FIR registered i.e. FIR No. 200/2002 under Sections 341/506/34 IPC at Police Station Paschim Vihar against Smt. Santosh Jain and her family without proper verification.

5. Based upon the complaint made by Smt. Santosh Jain on 07.05.2002, a charge sheet was issued on 12.11.2002 keeping in view the Delhi Police Establishment Punishment and Appeal Rules, 1980. The imputation of misconduct as reflected from the charge sheet is reproduced as under:

"I, Dr. P.S. Bhushan, Deputy Commissioner of Police, D.E. Cell, Delhi, the Enquiry Officer) hereby charge you Inspr. Om Parkash Ahlawat No. D-1/908 and SI Jitender Tiwari No. D/305 that on 05.05.2002 while you were posted as SHO/PS Paschim Vihar and SI/IO/PS Paschim Vihar respectively (both of) you took Smt Santosh Jain and Smt Anita Jain alongwith her two minor children in absence of any male family member to P S Paschim Vihar in pursuance of complaint of Suit Menu Jain dated 03/05/2002 ignoring earlier complaints of Smt Santosh Jain dated 02/05/2002 and her PCR call Both of you detained Smt Santosh Jain and her daughter-in-law Smt Anita Jain and her minor children in P S Paschim Vihar from 9:30 AM to 3:39 PM on 05/05/2002 where they were humiliated and threatened to vacate the house Due to above detention and harassment, Smt. Santosh Jain was hospitalized at Muni Maya Ram Jain Hospital, Pitampura, Delhi from 05/05/2002 (6:00 PM) to 06/05/2002 (10:00 PM). You SI Jitender Tiwari No D/305 accompanied Smt Meenu Jain to Flat No. GH-9/149, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi in the absence of the owner Smt Santosh Jain and her family due to her hospitalisation) and allowed Smt Menu Jain to enter in