SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Tosh Apartment Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking a declaration that the six sale deeds, all dated 30th May, 1997, executed by late Sh. Pradeep Kumar Khanna, predecessor-in-interest of the defendants no. 9 to 11, in favour of the defendants no.3 to 8, in respect of the property, being No. 21, Aurangzeb Road, New Delhi (suit property), are null and void. Consequential relief of cancellation of the said sale deeds from the record of the concerned Sub-Registrar is also sought.

PROCEEDINGS IN THE PRESENT SUIT

2. An application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), being I.A. 23802/2015, was filed on behalf of the defendants no. 3 to 8 on the ground that the plaint is time barred and it does not disclose any cause of action. I.A. 7939/2016 was filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC seeking amendment of the plaint. Vide order dated 28th April, 2017, this Court allowed I.A. 7939/2016 and dismissed I.A. 23802/2015. An appeal filed against the aforesaid order, being FAO(OS) 177/2017, was dismissed by the Division Bench vide judgment dated 30th May, 2017. On 14th November, 2017, following issues were framed i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top