Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Tosh Apartment Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking declaration of sale deeds as null and void (Para 1) |
| 2. procedural history and related applications filed (Para 2 , 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 3. submissions on behalf of defendants (Para 7 , 8 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. arguments regarding limitation and legal sanctity (Para 9 , 10 , 13 , 22) |
| 5. supreme court's findings and their implications (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. final decision to declare deeds void and grant costs (Para 18 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT
Amit Bansal, J. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking a declaration that the six sale deeds, all dated 30th May, 1997, executed by late Sh. Pradeep Kumar Khanna, predecessor-in-interest of the defendants no. 9 to 11, in favour of the defendants no.3 to 8, in respect of the property, being No. 21, Aurangzeb Road, New Delhi (suit property), are null and void. Consequential relief of cancellation of the said sale deeds from the record of the concerned Sub-Registrar is also sought.
PROCEEDINGS IN THE PRESENT SUIT
2. An application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), being I.A. 23802/2015, was filed on behalf of the defendants no. 3 to 8 on the ground that the plaint is time barred a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
