DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Manohar Lal Muniyal – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Lata – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. These two revision petitions arise out of the impugned order dated 18th October, 2019 in CS No.889/18 & 890/18 titled Shyam Lata v. Sanjay Muniyal & Anr., by which the applications under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed by the Petitioners/Defendants (hereinafter "Defendants") were rejected by the Trial Court.
3. Notably, in these petitions, notice was issued on 20th January, 2020 when the proceedings before the Trial Court were stayed. Thereafter, the Respondent-Plaintiff, Ms. Shyam Lata (hereinafter "Plaintiff") has been served and on the said date the Plaintiff was duly represented before this Court, however, thereafter she stopped appearing. On the previous date, i.e., 3rd December, 2021, this Court had directed the Trial Court to serve the Plaintiff in the suits through the Trial Court. However, it is informed by the ld. counsel for the Defendants, that on 8th January, 2022, before the Trial Court also, the Plaintiff did not appear. Therefore, the Plaintiff has not appeared in these petitions despite repeated opportunities. This Court has proceeded to hear the matter today and the De
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.