SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Manohar Lal Muniyal – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Lata – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. These two revision petitions arise out of the impugned order dated 18th October, 2019 in CS No.889/18 & 890/18 titled Shyam Lata v. Sanjay Muniyal & Anr., by which the applications under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed by the Petitioners/Defendants (hereinafter "Defendants") were rejected by the Trial Court.

3. Notably, in these petitions, notice was issued on 20th January, 2020 when the proceedings before the Trial Court were stayed. Thereafter, the Respondent-Plaintiff, Ms. Shyam Lata (hereinafter "Plaintiff") has been served and on the said date the Plaintiff was duly represented before this Court, however, thereafter she stopped appearing. On the previous date, i.e., 3rd December, 2021, this Court had directed the Trial Court to serve the Plaintiff in the suits through the Trial Court. However, it is informed by the ld. counsel for the Defendants, that on 8th January, 2022, before the Trial Court also, the Plaintiff did not appear. Therefore, the Plaintiff has not appeared in these petitions despite repeated opportunities. This Court has proceeded to hear the matter today and the De

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top