Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Manohar Lal Muniyal – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Lata – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and context of the dispute (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. trial court's findings on the rejection of plaint (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. defendants' primary arguments regarding limitation and validity (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. legal validity and implications of registered sale deeds (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. limitations and implications of not receiving full consideration (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. final judicial conclusions on maintainability of the suits (Para 22 , 23) |
| 7. conclusion and order of the court (Para 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. These two revision petitions arise out of the impugned order dated 18th October, 2019 in CS No.889/18 & 890/18 titled Shyam Lata v. Sanjay Muniyal & Anr., by which the applications under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed by the Petitioners/Defendants (hereinafter "Defendants") were rejected by the Trial Court.
3. Notably, in these petitions, notice was issued on 20th January, 2020 when the proceedings before the Trial Court were stayed. Thereafter, the Respondent-Plaintiff, Ms. Shyam Lata (hereinafter "Plaintiff") has been served and on the said date the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
