Kuldeep Singh vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Kuldeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. application allowed; petition disposed. (Para 1 , 2 , 8)
2. petitioners seek to quash premature reversion. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court directs compliance with advance notice. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL. 35835/2022 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is accordingly disposed of.

W.P.(C) 12004/2022 & CM APPL. 35834/2022 (for stay)

3. By way of the present petition, petitioners seek the following reliefs:

"(i) Issue of Writ of Certiorari for quashing of the order dated 05.08.2022 to the extent whereby the respondents have included the names of the petitioners amongst the officers whose deputation in Delhi Police have been prematurely reversed and cancelled; and

(ii) Issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioners to continue at their deputed organization, i.e. Delhi Police for a minimum of at least the approved tenure, i.e.03 years, keeping in view their special family circumstances, in terms of the OM dated 17.06.2010 issued by the DoPT as well the judgment dated 07.10.2005 passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Union of India and Ors. v V. Ramakrishnan..."

4. Learned counsel appea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document