K.Z. Khan vs National Commission for Women

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
K.Z. Khan – Appellant
Versus
National Commission for Women – Respondent

Table of Content
1. appellant seeks retraction of order without due notice. (Para 1 , 4 , 5)
2. court acknowledges acceptance of notice by respondents. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court declines to interfere with the interim order. (Para 6 , 7)
4. appeal dismissed; pending applications resolved. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant seeking the setting aside of interim order dated 24.02.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No. 2622/2022 and a direction to the respondents to permit the appellant to resume office as Private Secretary to the Chairperson, National Commission for women, during pendency of the aforesaid writ petition.

2. Issue notice.

3. Mr. Vivek Kumar Goyal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. Sidharth Khatana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents Nos. 4 to 6 accept notice.

4. The case of the appellant is that impugned order dated 24.02.2022 has not stayed the operation of Office Order No. 12/2021- 22/Establishment dated 02.02.2022, whereby the appellant has been repatriated to his parent department from the National Commission for Women. The appellant has filed the present appeal on the ground t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document