Satish Kumar Khurana vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Satish Kumar Khurana – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. appellant appeals conviction and sentence. (Para 1 , 2)
2. prosecution outlines the facts and evidence. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. police investigation and evidence collection. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. victim's injuries and cause of death established. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
5. forensic evidence corroborates prosecution case. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. evidence of blood type and connection to the crime. (Para 23 , 24)
7. trial proceedings and witness testimonies. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
8. witness credibility and testimony analysis. (Para 29 , 30)
9. summary of trial court findings. (Para 31)
10. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 32 , 33 , 34)
11. court's reasoning and legal standards. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)
12. final conclusions and judgment upheld. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)

JUDGMENT

Anup Jairam Bhambhani J. By way of the present appeal under section 374(2) read with section 383 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`CrPC'), the appellant Satish Kumar Khurana, assails judgement of conviction dated 01.05.2019 and order on sentence dated 07.05.2019 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (NDPS), Dwar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSIDDHARTH MRIDUL, ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANISatish Kumar Khurana – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Satish Kumar Khurana – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent