IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Neena Bansal Krishna, J.
Piyush Kumar Dutt - Appellant
Versus
Vishal Mega Mart Private Limited - Respondent
Arb.P. 436 of 2022
Decided On : 28-07-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under arbitration act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner’s claims regarding stock options. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondent's arguments against arbitration clause. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. disputes not arbitrable, according to respondent. (Para 17 , 18 , 22) |
| 5. court's view on validity of arbitration agreement. (Para 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 26) |
| 6. existence of arbitrable disputes established. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. arbitrator appointed for the arbitration. (Para 32) |
| 8. petition allowed, rights reserved. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna, J.
1. A petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed for appointment of an Arbitrator.
2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner as the erstwhile senior level employee, was officiating on the post of Chief Human Resource Officer in the respondent Company till 31st May, 2021 and has since then left the employment of the respondent Company. It is explained that the respondent Vishal Mega Mart is a Private Limited Company and is a resultant entity constituted upon merger/amalgamation of Vishal Mega Mart Private Limited and Rishant Wholesale Trading Private Limited pursuant to order dated 12th May, 2020 of CLT, Chandigarh Bench in CP (CAA)No.21/Chd/Hry/2019 whereby Rishant Wholesale Trading Private Limited changed its name to Vishal Mega Mart Private Limited. The respondent Company is engaged in the business of wholesale cash and carry. It is stated that prior to the merger, the petitioner entered into Employment Agreement dated 14th January, 2019 with Vishal Mega Mart Private Limited. The relevant terms of employment were as under:
"I. Petitioner's services as the Chief Human Resource Officer of the company was agreed to be continued on the terms and conditions of his employment agreement dated 14.01.2019.
II. Petitioner had to subscribe to 8,41,844 Equity Shares of Rs.10/-per Equity Share of Rishant Wholesale Trading Private Limited and subsequently through the merger of Rishanth Wholesale Trading Private Limited and the Company, a corresponding number of equity shares in the surviving entity post-merger by paying the applicable Employee Purchase Consideration.
III. Petitioner, besides agreed remunerations/bonus, was also granted 42,63,807 stock options of Rishant Wholesale Trading Private Ltd. Or the resultant entity at the strike price of Rs.10/-per Equity Share which were to vest over the following 5 years with 50% Time Based Options based upon tenure of employee and 50% Performance Based Options based upon performance of the company as per the applicable ESOP Plan/Scheme formulated in that regards.
The Respondent Company has since framed and brought into effect the relevant Rishanth Employee Stock Option Plan 2019 as supplemented by the Rishanth Employee Stock Option Scheme 2019 -"Scheme-II" which read with the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 provides for grant of "Employees Stock Options" to the eligible employees."
3. The respondent Company has since framed and brought into effect the relevant Rishant Employee Stock Option Plan 2019 as supplemented by the Rishant Employee Stock Option Scheme 2019 Scheme2 which read with the Company's (Share Capital and Debentures Closed Rules 2014) provides for grant of employees stock options to the eligible employees.
4. The petitioner tendered his resignation in terms of letter dated 01st March, 2021 and after successfully completing his Notice period of 90 days, he was relieved from his duties on 31st March, 2021. The petitioner in his Resignation Letter duly communicated his intention of retaining 8,41,844 equity shares subscribed/purchased by him and also opted to exercise his rights to acquire the vested stock options as per the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement dated 14th January, 2019 and the relevant Rishant Employee Stock Option Plan 2019 as supplemented by Rishant Employee Stock Option Scheme 2019-Scheme II.
5. It is submitted
An employment agreement with annexures containing stock option provisions establishes an arbitration agreement, allowing disputes over stock options to be arbitrated.
The court held that the absence of a formal regimen for amicable resolution in an arbitration clause does not impede invoking arbitration and that previous attempts to resolve disputes must be consid....
The court's decision emphasized the importance of appointing an arbitrator when efforts at amicable resolution have not succeeded, and there is no stipulation for amicable resolution in the arbitrati....
There cannot be splitting of causes of action one between the civil suit and the other arbitral proceedings. Hence, the dispute alleged by the petitioner against the respondents cannot be split and r....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the discretion to leave disp....
The court emphasized the non-arbitrable nature of the dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act and the importance of adhering to the limitation period for invoking arbitration, as well as the impact....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of party autonomy in arbitration, the enforceability of the entire arbitration clause, and the conditional acceptance of arbitration....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.