SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Kripa Shanker Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner’s leave application and absence history (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. respondent's decisions on leave and increments (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
3. petitioner’s arguments against impugned orders (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. respondent's defense regarding petitioner’s conduct (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. court's observations on due process and natural justice (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. principles of natural justice emphasized (Para 25 , 26 , 28 , 29)
7. orders set aside; new procedures required (Para 30 , 31)
8. disposal of writ petition and costs allocation (Para 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Banerjee, J. As per petitioner, since joining service with the Border Security Force (hereinafter referred as "BSF") in December, 1991 as Assistant Commandant, he moved up the rank to be promoted as Commandant in 2010. Petitioner then assumed charge as Superintendent of Police, Bureau of Police Research and Development, Ministry of Home Affairs (hereinafter referred to as "Bureau") on 01.08.2018. Between January, 2019 till September, 2019 petitioner sought leaves on as many as twelve different occasions from the DIG(Admn.), Bureau, due to his son's and his own me

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top